IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asdf] normative references -- Re: shepherd comments on draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-16.txt

Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org> Mon, 16 October 2023 15:46 UTC

Return-Path: <cabo@tzi.org>
X-Original-To: asdf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asdf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432ACC151992 for <asdf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 08:46:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tt8oCVsGmaYB for <asdf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 08:46:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de [134.102.50.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E939FC1519A4 for <asdf@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 08:45:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.217.124] (p548dc15c.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.141.193.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.zfn.uni-bremen.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4S8M013YvzzDCgS; Mon, 16 Oct 2023 17:45:53 +0200 (CEST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>
In-Reply-To: <11337.1697157141@localhost>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 17:45:53 +0200
Cc: asdf@ietf.org
X-Mao-Original-Outgoing-Id: 719163952.996598-dd52deffc2c24d583c6234504cb0cc9d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <28E357C0-3FA7-4D13-86BC-337B6F3AAF55@tzi.org>
References: <169622266506.58432.16744474713900421263@ietfa.amsl.com> <9674.1697156774@localhost> <11337.1697157141@localhost>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/asdf/a3jQD52t1Cw2tXNuONKXSO8O2Qk>
Subject: Re: [Asdf] normative references -- Re: shepherd comments on draft-ietf-asdf-sdf-16.txt
X-BeenThere: asdf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "A Semantic Description Format \(SDF\) for Things and their Interactions and Data" <asdf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/asdf>, <mailto:asdf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/asdf/>
List-Post: <mailto:asdf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asdf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asdf>, <mailto:asdf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2023 15:46:41 -0000

On 2023-10-13, at 02:32, Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> wrote:
> 
> Signed PGP part
> 
> I don't think BCP26 is normative: implementers don't need to know the rules
> to implement.  

BCP26 has been normative in the recent RFCs I have co-authored.
Here it provides the definition of the registration policies for 7.3.1 and 7.3.2, so it definitely is a normative reference.

> I'm not sure about IANA.params/IANA.senml.

Huh, it seems we forgot to reference IANA.params from Section 7.2, which is where we set up the unit sub-namespace.

Now https://github.com/ietf-wg-asdf/SDF/pull/140

The senml registry then goes right into that...

> RFC0020 -- kudos for linking to such a low numbered RFC :-)
> It's hard to argue that it's not normative, yet.

It *is* normative…

Grüße, Carsten

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email