Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)

waltdnes@waltdnes.org Sat, 31 May 2003 05:19 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA12049 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sat, 31 May 2003 01:19:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h4V5JN605522 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sat, 31 May 2003 01:19:23 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4V5JNB05519 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Sat, 31 May 2003 01:19:23 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA12004; Sat, 31 May 2003 01:19:20 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19LykM-00051W-00; Sat, 31 May 2003 01:17:38 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19LykL-00051T-00; Sat, 31 May 2003 01:17:37 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4V5I6B05495; Sat, 31 May 2003 01:18:06 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4V5HOB05467 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Sat, 31 May 2003 01:17:24 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id BAA11992 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 May 2003 01:17:21 -0400 (EDT)
From: waltdnes@waltdnes.org
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19LyiR-00051M-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Sat, 31 May 2003 01:15:39 -0400
Received: from dci.doncaster.on.ca ([66.11.168.194] helo=smtp.istop.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19LyiQ-00051J-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Sat, 31 May 2003 01:15:38 -0400
Received: from waltdnes.org (ip196-165.tor.istop.com [66.11.165.196]) by smtp.istop.com (Postfix) with SMTP id B3B0136A2B for <asrg@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 May 2003 01:17:19 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by waltdnes.org (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 31 May 2003 01:17:26 -0400
To: ASRG list <asrg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
Message-ID: <20030531051726.GA1201@m433>
References: <DD198B5D07F04347B7266A3F35C42B0B017F4A@io.cybercom.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <DD198B5D07F04347B7266A3F35C42B0B017F4A@io.cybercom.local>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Sat, 31 May 2003 01:17:26 -0400

On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 01:05:04PM -1000, Peter Kay wrote

> However, that being said, go ahead and try to send email using
> well-engineered mass emailing software and you will see that it does,
> in fact, remove your email address from the database.
> 
> Can we say with absolute certainty that all spammers remove all bad
> emails? Of course not. But look at the feature set of most all
> mass-email software and you will see features to auto-delist email
> addresses with "hard bounces".

  A well-managed mailing list, using "well-engineered mass emailing
software" will do proper confirmed opt-in, so you won't need to
challenge it.  If all mass mailings were done that way, there wouldn't
any spam in the first place.  It's the spammers (whether they be
chickenboners or spammers-in-pinstripe-suits such as Topica, Shagmail,
Experian, Harris, etc) who don't play nice.

> What we really need is to talk to some first class spammers.

  And they'll tell you that filtering and blocking their "important
information" and "exciting offers" makes you an anti-commerce net-nazi.

-- 
Walter Dnes <waltdnes@waltdnes.org>
Email users are divided into two classes;
1) Those who have effective spam-blocking
2) Those who wish they did
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg