Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)

Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net> Fri, 30 May 2003 01:45 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA03870 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Thu, 29 May 2003 21:45:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h4U1jS109806 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Thu, 29 May 2003 21:45:28 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4U1jSB09803 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 29 May 2003 21:45:28 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA03837; Thu, 29 May 2003 21:45:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19LYvp-00064i-00; Thu, 29 May 2003 21:43:45 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19LYvo-00064f-00; Thu, 29 May 2003 21:43:44 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4U1i5B09693; Thu, 29 May 2003 21:44:05 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h4U1hCB09637 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Thu, 29 May 2003 21:43:12 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA03802 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Thu, 29 May 2003 21:43:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19LYtd-00063g-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Thu, 29 May 2003 21:41:29 -0400
Received: from 216-220-241-233.midmaine.com ([216.220.241.233] helo=nic-naa.net) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19LYtc-00063Y-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Thu, 29 May 2003 21:41:28 -0400
Received: from nic-naa.net (localhost.nic-naa.net [127.0.0.1]) by nic-naa.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4U1Zndn057250; Thu, 29 May 2003 21:35:49 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <200305300135.h4U1Zndn057250@nic-naa.net>
To: Peter Kay <peter@titankey.com>
cc: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>, Yakov Shafranovich <research@solidmatrix.com>, asrg@ietf.org, brunner@nic-naa.net
Subject: Re: [Asrg] TitanKey and "white lies"... (Faking SMTP hard errors "improves" C/R utility?)
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 29 May 2003 12:31:32 -1000." <DD198B5D07F04347B7266A3F35C42B0B017F49@io.cybercom.local>
From: Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <brunner@nic-naa.net>
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 21:35:49 -0400

> 1. we don't really care what error message to generate.

You may want to reconsider this.

> What's important to us ...

May not have a single answer.

Anyway, the report the fragment quoted from caused a party in an action to
drop money on the table. It isn't perfect (my litigator would prefer that
I write for an 11th grade (US) reader with little computer experience and
no "theory", but that's getting ahead of my self), but it is what I wrote.

Eric
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg