IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 7

Meng Weng Wong <mengwong@dumbo.pobox.com> Mon, 16 June 2003 20:14 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA29893 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:14:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h5GKEDN32692 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:14:13 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (lists.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5GKECm32689 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:14:12 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA29871; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:14:10 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19S0Ka-000683-00; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:11:56 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19S0KZ-000680-00; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:11:55 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5GGD1a15483; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:13:01 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5GGD0m15473 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:13:00 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA19475 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:12:57 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19RwZ9-0003hH-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:10:43 -0400
Received: from dumbo.pobox.com ([208.210.125.24]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19RwZ9-0003hE-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:10:43 -0400
Received: by dumbo.pobox.com (Postfix, from userid 505) id CC2A8DE44; Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:12:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: Meng Weng Wong <mengwong@dumbo.pobox.com>
To: asrg@ietf.org
Message-ID: <20030616161257.GF25291@dumbo.pobox.com>
References: <20030614055858.GB12997@dumbo.pobox.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20030615114312.00ba1d90@std5.imagineis.com> <20030616160157.GC12997@dumbo.pobox.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20030616160157.GC12997@dumbo.pobox.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
Subject: [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 7
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 12:12:57 -0400

On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 12:01:57PM -0400, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
| 
| ... some objections to SPF have come from people who
| 
| 7) assert flatly that it won't work; assert that similar approaches
|    have been proposed and, broadly, "failed"; therefore so will SPF;
| 

Damian Conway: "if nothing you've tried so far has worked, try
something new."  SPF counts as new.  I have seen several people
criticize SPF as unworkable.  I invite them to propose a specific
alternative.  If they will not, then these people won't lead, and they
won't follow; they need to get out of the way.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email