IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 8

"Jon Kyme" <jrk@merseymail.com> Tue, 17 June 2003 12:26 UTC

Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA09957 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 08:26:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h5HCPZA23016 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 08:25:35 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5HCPZm23013 for <asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 08:25:35 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA09928; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 08:25:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19SFUb-0005UE-00; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 08:23:17 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=www1.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19SFUa-0005UB-00; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 08:23:16 -0400
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5HAC1a14022; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 06:12:01 -0400
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h5HABbm14001 for <asrg@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 06:11:37 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id GAA05680 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 06:11:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19SDOx-0004d4-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 06:09:19 -0400
Received: from argon.connect.org.uk ([193.110.243.33]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19SDOw-0004d1-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 06:09:18 -0400
Received: from mmail by argon.connect.org.uk with local (connectmail/exim) id 19SDQr-0000kM-00; Tue, 17 Jun 2003 11:11:17 +0100
In-Reply-To: <20030616161705.GG25291@dumbo.pobox.com>
Subject: [Asrg] Re: SPF: Objection 8
To: Meng Weng Wong <mengwong@dumbo.pobox.com>
From: Jon Kyme <jrk@merseymail.com>
Cc: ASRG <asrg@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: [ConnectMail 3.5.6]
X-connectmail-Originating-IP: 172.25.243.3
Message-Id: <E19SDQr-0000kM-00@argon.connect.org.uk>
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 11:11:17 +0100

> On Mon, Jun 16, 2003 at 12:01:57PM -0400, Meng Weng Wong wrote:
> | 
> | ... some objections to SPF have come from people who
> | 
> | 8) do not see beyond the short future that is explicitly described;
> | 
> 
> 
> Of course spammers will react to SPF.  If you can think of specific
> actions they will take, let's discuss them.
> 
> I've already thought of one response; the "throwaway domain" scenario
> is addressed in the FAQ at
> 
>   http://spf.pobox.com/faq.html#noprevent


Doesn't this entire proposal tend to a blacklist?






--
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email