RE: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record
Yakov Shafranovich <research@solidmatrix.com> Mon, 14 July 2003 00:52 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA10074 for <asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 20:52:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19brZ6-0002FJ-8J for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 20:51:40 -0400
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id h6E0peIh008627 for asrg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 20:51:40 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19brZ6-0002F4-49 for asrg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 20:51:40 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA10055; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 20:51:36 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19brZ3-0000IZ-00; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 20:51:37 -0400
Received: from ietf.org ([132.151.1.19] helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19brZ3-0000IW-00; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 20:51:37 -0400
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19brYT-00029D-U8; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 20:51:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19brYL-00028z-No for asrg@optimus.ietf.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 20:50:53 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA10025 for <asrg@ietf.org>; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 20:50:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19brYJ-0000I1-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 20:50:51 -0400
Received: from 000-234-318.area5.spcsdns.net ([68.27.154.131] helo=68.27.154.131) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19brYG-0000Hy-00 for asrg@ietf.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 20:50:50 -0400
Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20030713204802.00b34458@std5.imagineis.com>
X-Sender: research@solidmatrix.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9
To: asrg@ietf.org
From: Yakov Shafranovich <research@solidmatrix.com>
Subject: RE: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record
In-Reply-To: <2A1D4C86842EE14CA9BC80474919782E0D2322@mou1wnexm02.verisig n.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-MimeHeaders-Plugin-Info: v2.03.00
Sender: asrg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: asrg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: asrg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/asrg/>
Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 20:50:30 -0400
At 01:32 PM 7/13/2003 -0700, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote: >I don't think that a reverse MX record should be prohibitive. > >It is fair for a reverse MX record to have a statement such as 'this is a >dialup' or 'this is a broadband consumer account' or 'this address not >issued'. But that should be seen as an input to the filter/accept criteria. >...... To put it within the consent paradigm, the RMX/rDNS data supplies information to the consent system which uses that information to make a decision on the incoming message. The user or owner of the mailbox is left free to decide how the information is acted on in the consent policy. Yakov _______________________________________________ Asrg mailing list Asrg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg
- [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record Walter Dnes
- Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record Daniel Feenberg
- Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record Florian Weimer
- Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record Daniel Feenberg
- Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record Alan DeKok
- Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record Kee Hinckley
- Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record Daniel Feenberg
- RE: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record Scott Nelson
- Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record Alan DeKok
- RE: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record Yakov Shafranovich
- 3. Requirements - IPv6 support (was Re: [Asrg] Pr… Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record Yakov Shafranovich
- Re: 3. Requirements - IPv6 support (was Re: [Asrg… C. Wegrzyn
- [Asrg] Re: 3. Requirements - IPv6 support Andrew Akehurst
- Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record Walter Dnes
- Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record Walter Dnes
- Re: [Asrg] Proposal: NO_XMIT DNS record Walter Dnes
- Re: 3. Requirements - IPv6 support (was Re: [Asrg… Dave Crocker
- Re: 3. Requirements - IPv6 support (was Re: [Asrg… Walter Dnes