IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl-08.txt (fwd)

"David Nicol" <davidnicol@gmail.com> Wed, 19 November 2008 20:26 UTC

Return-Path: <asrg-bounces@irtf.org>
X-Original-To: asrg-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-asrg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53D43A683E; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:26:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290503A683E for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:26:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VHpUy58Xe6sG for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:26:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.178]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE7F3A6782 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:26:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id j37so54115waf.23 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:26:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=zs2YDQrGYm4Nq2JGEGzkD6d/7JCvJiCGXZlP+rnN4tM=; b=b3Bs+zkMjG87M/axovLG5y+PeJvt1uoOg+2isLlscYPSR1mKvI1AZqq4KvsGdUj+4E nlDv59MJSw3SOVIu4ReGaSC6OBBU5W4RV14WsJ+AS3gpMpZmk1zfiNfgdKR3PO2BMn2q TaKfTTRFvQi0sG4pXvAyb4PQ6HjdCEQrZCurc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=kFnLJI4OvCOaECJtZPrXpnhHLGfJFK01KC4xypjRcEHUQELBF27UBQGD8heex4nVgE UgMNIUwiyEKpUo8lSb9KvmHDMRrOhUE6Q38m9ItrM9gF8O61cyLyUn8EIGL0T7bkI07u UPRfmzc9qZvlwjvbghjIfUjf4PfJM+4r85KyU=
Received: by 10.115.74.16 with SMTP id b16mr866354wal.45.1227126403290; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:26:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.196.6 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:26:43 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <934f64a20811191226r31987293y8f4db1cffc7a3348@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:26:43 -0600
From: David Nicol <davidnicol@gmail.com>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
In-Reply-To: <49246FAD.1080006@nortel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <4606143.01227048087075.JavaMail.franck@franck-martins-macbook-pro.local> <49235469.8090306@nortel.com> <4923AC56.8060509@leisi.net> <934f64a20811191106p69bc9ec7j8440572ca67a18e8@mail.gmail.com> <49246FAD.1080006@nortel.com>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl-08.txt (fwd)
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/pipermail/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: asrg-bounces@irtf.org
Errors-To: asrg-bounces@irtf.org

On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Chris Lewis <clewis@nortel.com> wrote:

>> I believe we have two dots under discussion at this time which may be
>> properly connected:
>> Have RBL operators allow opting in for them, then send ARF reports on listing.
>
> We had this conversation a little over a week ago in terms of
> instrumenting MTAs to send off ARF reports automatically.

not MTAs, but DNSBLs

> That might work on some smaller DNSBLs that work on a strict "spam in
> hand" basis.  Eg: SBL.

for which it would make sense, of course.

I believe in an implied "where it would make sense" and an implied
dismissal of specific situations where something that makes sense in
some situations doesn't make sense doesn't make sense.  ASRG is the
only forum I am aware of where this belief may put me in the minority
(laugh)
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email