IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Asrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl-08.txt (fwd)

"David Nicol" <davidnicol@gmail.com> Wed, 19 November 2008 19:06 UTC

Return-Path: <asrg-bounces@irtf.org>
X-Original-To: asrg-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-asrg-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F4D03A694C; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:06:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Original-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: asrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CBA3A694C for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:06:22 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.400, BAYES_00=-2.599, SARE_SUB_RAND_LETTRS4=0.799]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lzGIZhNjMxQp for <asrg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:06:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com (wf-out-1314.google.com [209.85.200.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BEE93A6782 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:06:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by wf-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id 24so84905wfg.7 for <asrg@irtf.org>; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:06:21 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=LdBDYHBWeTZEdv+G0DBvq76m5x18Fw42La9CMaSMP/U=; b=fSdFoW1RB+biBKfO0dPkd0hcR9gafCyWnXzhSXOvVy4hdbozqZGaQ99Ppy6y3s9Xax jAic+rjDnxr5ji0WqhGUXTEX7MwSkQqC7hYkGCbnMVYiSH8aZVSpahwAVaJo2asOZw1o uQaVWWSILWb3BvSwzYN9v7vAhRDN8//EX264I=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=H2bsmssVzugUDL6pyYU0wcS7u1Jf9Y7JBud6uqhwrGZthw/zV3fxgJ4pRzGdytYlvS Z8SCju1TAORJyjaQuAtCjvhiIuLqFT5PywuTxuJlagSK20pmRbE9WGnMvGoNMfFp8m0E 6FTR5cpKotqkb2cBMkvN3sMiyTyBObrjH4X20=
Received: by 10.115.54.7 with SMTP id g7mr825839wak.95.1227121580850; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:06:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.196.6 with HTTP; Wed, 19 Nov 2008 11:06:20 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <934f64a20811191106p69bc9ec7j8440572ca67a18e8@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:06:20 -0600
From: David Nicol <davidnicol@gmail.com>
To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
In-Reply-To: <4923AC56.8060509@leisi.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <4606143.01227048087075.JavaMail.franck@franck-martins-macbook-pro.local> <49235469.8090306@nortel.com> <4923AC56.8060509@leisi.net>
Subject: Re: [Asrg] I-D Action: draft-irtf-asrg-dnsbl-08.txt (fwd)
X-BeenThere: asrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg@irtf.org>
List-Id: Anti-Spam Research Group - IRTF <asrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/pipermail/asrg>
List-Post: <mailto:asrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg>, <mailto:asrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: asrg-bounces@irtf.org
Errors-To: asrg-bounces@irtf.org

On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 12:04 AM, Matthias Leisi <matthias@leisi.net> wrote:
>
> Chris Lewis schrieb:
>
>> There's also a consideration of scaling.  Having a few dozen
>> organizations continually rescanning their, say, /16s could get rather
>> old quick.
>
> An old wish: Have some protocol to enable queries like "return all
> listings for IP addresses in a.b.c.d/N" (for some reasonably max value
> of N, possibly 24?).
>
> Yes, that's easily done if you have a local copy of the data, but that
> is not always feasible (or has considerable cost).

I believe we have two dots under discussion at this time which may be
properly connected:
Have RBL operators allow opting in for them, then send ARF reports on listing.
_______________________________________________
Asrg mailing list
Asrg@irtf.org
https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/asrg

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email