IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [atoca] The future of atoca

Tony Rutkowski <trutkowski@netmagic.com> Sat, 21 July 2012 20:29 UTC

Return-Path: <trutkowski@netmagic.com>
X-Original-To: atoca@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: atoca@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1D921F8533 for <atoca@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 13:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5q8ttWVu8omD for <atoca@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 13:29:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vms173011pub.verizon.net (vms173011pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 256FE21F8532 for <atoca@ietf.org>; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 13:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.4] ([unknown] [173.72.150.118]) by vms173011.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0M7J00E7W2A3XYB5@vms173011.mailsrvcs.net> for atoca@ietf.org; Sat, 21 Jul 2012 15:30:08 -0500 (CDT)
Message-id: <500B114B.4090209@netmagic.com>
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 16:30:03 -0400
From: Tony Rutkowski <trutkowski@netmagic.com>
Organization: NetMagic Associates
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120717 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: Art Botterell <acb@incident.com>
References: <20120721131113.7B35C21F8646@ietfa.amsl.com> <B1C4C394-1E40-48FF-AE06-7B3871EEAA08@incident.com>
In-reply-to: <B1C4C394-1E40-48FF-AE06-7B3871EEAA08@incident.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Cc: "kathleen.moriarty@emc.com" <kathleen.moriarty@emc.com>, atoca@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [atoca] The future of atoca
X-BeenThere: atoca@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: trutkowski@netmagic.com
List-Id: "Discussion list for the IETF Authority-to-Citizen Alert \(atoca\) working group." <atoca.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/atoca>, <mailto:atoca-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/atoca>
List-Post: <mailto:atoca@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:atoca-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/atoca>, <mailto:atoca-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 20:29:09 -0000

Hi Art,

Good admonitions.

As someone who participates significantly in the
MILE group (ironically dealing with incidents),
I'm curious if anyone has contemplated treating
an emergency warning message as simply a
specialized instance of incident messages,
and potentially using IODEF SCI to move
CAP messages under that aegis?

There is a certain irony in Q4/17 (from which
I'm about to depart), that they are both within
that same group.

best,
tony


On 7/21/2012 1:41 PM, Art Botterell wrote:
> Mark makes the essential point, IMHO.  This working group may simply have been ahead of its time.  So if the WG format isn't appropriate... I don't really have an opinion on that... I hope we can find some way to keep a less formal conversation going among folks who are interested, in anticipation that relevant issues may come clear over the next few years.
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email