Re: [auth48] [AD] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9333 <draft-ietf-lwig-minimal-esp-12> for your review

[Erik Kline <[e-mail]>]

LGTM, thank you!

On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 1:46 PM Rebecca VanRheenen <[e-mail]>
wrote:

> Hi Erik,
>
> Thank you for the reply. We added quotation marks around all instances of
> “dummy” and added the following sentence to the end of the first paragraph
> of Section 6:
>
>    (Note that this document uses the term "dummy" for consistency
>    with [RFC4303].)
>
> Please let us know if you approve this or if you prefer different text or
> placement. These changes are best viewed in this diff file (shows all
> changes made during AUTH48):
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9333-auth48diff.html.
>
> Once this has been approved, we can move this document forward in the
> publication process.
>
> Updated XML file:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9333.xml
>
> Updated output files:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9333.txt
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9333.pdf
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9333.html
>
> Diff file showing all changes made during AUTH48:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9333-auth48diff.html
>
> Diff files showing all changes:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9333-diff.html
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9333-rfcdiff.html (side-by-side
> diff)
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9333-alt-diff.html (diff to see
> changes in moved/deleted text)
>
> AUTH48 status page:
>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9333
>
>
> Thank you,
> RFC Editor/rv
>
>
> > On Dec 18, 2022, at 6:43 PM, Erik Kline <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >
> > I think option (3) (quotation marks + disclaimer statement) is probably
> simplest.
> >
> > Thanks!
>
>