Re: [auth48] [C381] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9306 <draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-12> for your review

Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com> Mon, 26 September 2022 21:34 UTC

Return-Path: <apaloma@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE7F1C14F723; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 14:34:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.207
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.207 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id f0C1LSMb12r8; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 14:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A495FC14F736; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 14:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90CD0425A375; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 14:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RhIBPk2HYIs6; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 14:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from amss-mbp.attlocal.net (unknown [IPv6:2600:1700:bac0:1070:9467:e52e:88de:8036]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 327E6425977A; Mon, 26 Sep 2022 14:34:32 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.120.23.2.7\))
From: Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <CANU+7XHmj1yqyDZ-wW1JDOv90NBaJJgU_QPXX85Xd6DbJJo--w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 14:34:31 -0700
Cc: "rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "lisp-ads@ietf.org" <lisp-ads@ietf.org>, "lisp-chairs@ietf.org" <lisp-chairs@ietf.org>, "ggx@gigix.net" <ggx@gigix.net>, "auth48archive@rfc-editor.org" <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <9152AB9B-A111-4810-9A26-532A4E9EA514@amsl.com>
References: <20220916211431.72DE1AB20F@rfcpa.amsl.com> <IA1PR11MB6347EBEC1BB912F5F8895649D34D9@IA1PR11MB6347.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <394C9012-3799-4531-AE23-DE48133D059A@amsl.com> <70908361-26BD-4F72-8B7D-3B11364E242F@gmail.com> <7A8758AE-6AB4-448F-BF02-3FF50DB8A656@amsl.com> <C479A158-3819-4A8B-AC5E-336534606301@cisco.com> <6AC5D534-E604-46D6-AC04-2F3FA1BD6B6D@amsl.com> <B5BE9701-8DA5-492F-B09D-0409E13E428C@amsl.com> <CANU+7XHmj1yqyDZ-wW1JDOv90NBaJJgU_QPXX85Xd6DbJJo--w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Vina Ermagan <ermagan@gmail.com>, "Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)" <natal@cisco.com>, "Anton Smirnov (asmirnov)" <asmirnov=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "Vrushali Ashtaputre (vrushali)" <vrushali@cisco.com>, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.120.23.2.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/1yVURp12bIDPwRrTYAJJnS9nRc8>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [C381] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9306 <draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-12> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2022 21:34:37 -0000

Hi Authors,

Dino - Please note that we have addressed the issue regarding RFC-to-be 9303 in its corresponding email thread; we have cc’d you in that email. 

We have now received all necessary approvals and consider AUTH48 complete:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9306

As this document is part of Cluster C381, you may track the progress of all documents in this cluster through AUTH48 at:
https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/C381

We will move this document forward in the publication process once the other necessary documents in the cluster complete AUTH48 as well.

Please let us know if you have any questions.

RFC Editor/ap

> On Sep 23, 2022, at 4:09 PM, Vina Ermagan <ermagan@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I approve.
> 
> Thanks,
> Vina
> 
> On Fri, Sep 23, 2022 at 2:52 PM Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com> wrote:
> Hi Authors,
> 
> We have updated the affiliation information in the files accordingly.
> 
> We will await Vina’s approval prior to moving this document forward in the publication process. 
> 
> The files have been posted here (please refresh):
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9306.xml
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9306.txt
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9306.html
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9306.pdf
> 
> The relevant diff files have been posted here:
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9306-diff.html (comprehensive diff)
> https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9306-auth48diff.html (AUTH48 changes)
> 
> For the AUTH48 status of this document, please see:
>  https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9306
> 
> Thank you,
> RFC Editor/ap
> 
> > On Sep 21, 2022, at 12:29 PM, Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com> wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Vrushali,
> > 
> > Thank you for your reply. We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page:
> >  https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9306
> > 
> > Please note that we are awaiting word regarding how Vina and Dino would would like their affiliation information to appear across the documents in C381, as well as Vina’s approval. Once these are received, we will move this document forward in the publication process. 
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > RFC Editor/ap
> > 
> >> On Sep 20, 2022, at 9:25 AM, Vrushali Ashtaputre (vrushali) <vrushali@cisco.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >> I approve.
> >> 
> >> Thank You,
> >> Vrushali
> >> 
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Alanna Paloma <apaloma@amsl.com>
> >> Date: Tuesday, September 20, 2022 at 8:47 AM
> >> To: Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com>
> >> Cc: "Anton Smirnov (asmirnov)" <asmirnov=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "Alberto Rodriguez-Natal (natal)" <natal@cisco.com>, "rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org" <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, "ermagan@gmail.com" <ermagan@gmail.com>, "Vrushali Ashtaputre (vrushali)" <vrushali@cisco.com>, "lisp-ads@ietf.org" <lisp-ads@ietf.org>, "lisp-chairs@ietf.org" <lisp-chairs@ietf.org>, "ggx@gigix.net" <ggx@gigix.net>, "auth48archive@rfc-editor.org" <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
> >> Subject: Re: [C381] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9306 <draft-ietf-lisp-vendor-lcaf-12> for your review
> >> 
> >>   Hi Dino,
> >> 
> >>   Thank you for your reply. We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page:
> >>     https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9306
> >> 
> >>   Best regards,
> >>   RFC Editor/ap
> >> 
> >>> On Sep 19, 2022, at 12:37 PM, Dino Farinacci <farinacci@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> 
> >>>> We will await approvals from Dino, Vina, and Vrushali prior to moving this document forward in the publication process.
> >>> 
> >>> I approve.
> >>> 
> >>> Dino
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> 
> > 
>