Re: [auth48] [AD - Erik ] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9523 <draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-25> for your review

Madison Church <mchurch@amsl.com> Tue, 20 February 2024 15:59 UTC

Return-Path: <mchurch@amsl.com>
X-Original-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: auth48archive@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B14A9C18DB86; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 07:59:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BBEaOW8wNGSM; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 07:59:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c8a.amsl.com (c8a.amsl.com [4.31.198.40]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3381C18DB87; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 07:59:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDD1B424CD01; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 07:59:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
Received: from c8a.amsl.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (c8a.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tm0XrkADp2NI; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 07:59:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (unknown [199.192.158.121]) by c8a.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 425BA424B455; Tue, 20 Feb 2024 07:59:53 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.300.61.1.2\))
From: Madison Church <mchurch@amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMGpriXf4enD=s91tppvZhFAP6Cdo0vDY6hmqoH3o60PgzBA1A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 09:59:42 -0600
Cc: RFC Editor <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, ntp-ads@ietf.org, ntp-chairs@ietf.org, Dieter Sibold <dsibold.ietf@gmail.com>, auth48archive <auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A66E6665-83D0-4D7A-9CC2-815C9EFA95AF@amsl.com>
References: <CAM-HxCPoa-Jh0cZ5G6pK8x+fo9qzW=MPs3-au_qZZTDQCN-b6Q@mail.gmail.com> <FC5638D2-2AFA-4441-8C59-155B059BEF13@gmail.com> <7A168A45-4308-40FB-8986-B3EB4801CC5B@mail.huji.ac.il> <F8B23289-C514-4A11-9751-673FA2B4DBD1@amsl.com> <0DE80A63-7B58-410D-B15F-C671C5F6C50B@amsl.com> <DD72CEB5-2709-4273-B73F-171E325CC8BE@amsl.com> <EF266A5D-8742-4EE8-8820-46EEFF5B090C@amsl.com> <FAA15F76-1F5D-4818-BADE-A9D723D98BBA@amsl.com> <CAMGpriXf4enD=s91tppvZhFAP6Cdo0vDY6hmqoH3o60PgzBA1A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>, Danny Dolev <danny.dolev@gmail.com>, Neta R S <neta.r.schiff@gmail.com>, Tal Mizrahi <tal.mizrahi.phd@gmail.com>, schapiram@huji.ac.il
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.300.61.1.2)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/auth48archive/c0-OCewD2YbiwhrvAHq4hiX40_4>
Subject: Re: [auth48] [AD - Erik ] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9523 <draft-ietf-ntp-chronos-25> for your review
X-BeenThere: auth48archive@rfc-editor.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Archiving AUTH48 exchanges between the RFC Production Center, the authors, and other related parties" <auth48archive.rfc-editor.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/options/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/>
List-Post: <mailto:auth48archive@rfc-editor.org>
List-Help: <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mailman.rfc-editor.org/mailman/listinfo/auth48archive>, <mailto:auth48archive-request@rfc-editor.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 15:59:57 -0000

Hi All,

Erik - Thank you for your reply! We have noted your approval on the AUTH48 status page (see https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9523). 

We have now received all necessary approvals and consider AUTH48 complete. Thank you all for your attention and guidance during the AUTH48 process! We will prepare the document for publication shortly.

Best regards,
RFC Editor/mc

> On Feb 19, 2024, at 6:06 PM, Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Comprehensive diffs:
>>   https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9523-diff.html
> 
> This looks good to me (LGTM).
> 
> I think the wording in S4.1 ("thereby, ...") is not the most natural,
> but seems clear enough.
> 
> Thanks all, and apologies for the delay.