Re: [auth48] AUTH48: RFC-to-be 9446 <draft-farrell-tenyearsafter-05> for your review

[Jean Mahoney <[e-mail]>]

Eliot,

We will await word from all authors before updating the document.

Best regards,

RFC Editor/jm

On 7/12/23 9:01 AM, Independent Submissions Editor (Eliot Lear) wrote:
> Thank you, RFC Editor Team, for your thorough and timely editing!  My suggestion is that you NOT revise the draft RFC until all authors have had a chance to comment.
>
> AUTHORS: please review ALL versions of the draft RFC before you approve. I have already noted at least one edit that will need to be reverted, but you will find that the overwhelming majority of the changes made are appropriate, so give a good look.
>
> As for timing, Stephen will be back over the weekend.  No prize for fastest here. Just be sure you like what you read.
>
> Eliot
>
>> On 12 Jul 2023, at 02:55, [e-mail] wrote:
>>
>> *****IMPORTANT*****
>>
>> Updated 2023/07/11
>>
>> RFC Author(s):
>> --------------
>>
>> Instructions for Completing AUTH48
>>
>> Your document has now entered AUTH48.  Once it has been reviewed and
>> approved by you and all coauthors, it will be published as an RFC.
>> If an author is no longer available, there are several remedies
>> available as listed in the FAQ (https://www.rfc-editor.org/faq/).
>>
>> You and you coauthors are responsible for engaging other parties
>> (e.g., Contributors or Working Group) as necessary before providing
>> your approval.
>>
>> Planning your review
>> ---------------------
>>
>> Please review the following aspects of your document:
>>
>> *  RFC Editor questions
>>
>>    Please review and resolve any questions raised by the RFC Editor
>>    that have been included in the XML file as comments marked as
>>    follows:
>>
>>    <!-- [rfced] ... -->
>>
>>    These questions will also be sent in a subsequent email.
>>
>> *  Changes submitted by coauthors
>>
>>    Please ensure that you review any changes submitted by your
>>    coauthors.  We assume that if you do not speak up that you
>>    agree to changes submitted by your coauthors.
>>
>> *  Content
>>
>>    Please review the full content of the document, as this cannot
>>    change once the RFC is published.  Please pay particular attention to:
>>    - IANA considerations updates (if applicable)
>>    - contact information
>>    - references
>>
>> *  Copyright notices and legends
>>
>>    Please review the copyright notice and legends as defined in
>>    RFC 5378 and the Trust Legal Provisions
>>    (TLP – https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info/).
>>
>> *  Semantic markup
>>
>>    Please review the markup in the XML file to ensure that elements of
>>    content are correctly tagged.  For example, ensure that <sourcecode>
>>    and <artwork> are set correctly.  See details at
>>    <https://authors.ietf.org/rfcxml-vocabulary>.
>>
>> *  Formatted output
>>
>>    Please review the PDF, HTML, and TXT files to ensure that the
>>    formatted output, as generated from the markup in the XML file, is
>>    reasonable.  Please note that the TXT will have formatting
>>    limitations compared to the PDF and HTML.
>>
>>
>> Submitting changes
>> ------------------
>>
>> To submit changes, please reply to this email using ‘REPLY ALL’ as all
>> the parties CCed on this message need to see your changes. The parties
>> include:
>>
>>    *  your coauthors
>>
>>    *  [e-mail] (the RPC team)
>>
>>    *  other document participants, depending on the stream (e.g.,
>>       IETF Stream participants are your working group chairs, the
>>       responsible ADs, and the document shepherd).
>>
>>    *  [e-mail], which is a new archival mailing list
>>       to preserve AUTH48 conversations; it is not an active discussion
>>       list:
>>
>>      *  More info:
>>         https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ietf-announce/yb6lpIGh-4Q9l2USxIAe6P8O4Zc
>>
>>      *  The archive itself:
>>         https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/auth48archive/
>>
>>      *  Note: If only absolutely necessary, you may temporarily opt out
>>         of the archiving of messages (e.g., to discuss a sensitive matter).
>>         If needed, please add a note at the top of the message that you
>>         have dropped the address. When the discussion is concluded,
>>         [e-mail] will be re-added to the CC list and
>>         its addition will be noted at the top of the message.
>>
>> You may submit your changes in one of two ways:
>>
>> An update to the provided XML file
>> — OR —
>> An explicit list of changes in this format
>>
>> Section # (or indicate Global)
>>
>> OLD:
>> old text
>>
>> NEW:
>> new text
>>
>> You do not need to reply with both an updated XML file and an explicit
>> list of changes, as either form is sufficient.
>>
>> We will ask a stream manager to review and approve any changes that seem
>> beyond editorial in nature, e.g., addition of new text, deletion of text,
>> and technical changes.  Information about stream managers can be found in
>> the FAQ.  Editorial changes do not require approval from a stream manager.
>>
>>
>> Approving for publication
>> --------------------------
>>
>> To approve your RFC for publication, please reply to this email stating
>> that you approve this RFC for publication.  Please use ‘REPLY ALL’,
>> as all the parties CCed on this message need to see your approval.
>>
>>
>> Files
>> -----
>>
>> The files are available here:
>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9446.xml
>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9446.html
>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9446.pdf
>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9446.txt
>>
>> Diff file of the text:
>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9446-diff.html
>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9446-rfcdiff.html (side by side)
>>
>> Diff of the XML:
>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9446-xmldiff1.html
>>
>> The following files are provided to facilitate creation of your own
>> diff files of the XML.
>>
>> Initial XMLv3 created using XMLv2 as input:
>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9446.original.v2v3.xml
>>
>> XMLv3 file that is a best effort to capture v3-related format updates
>> only:
>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9446.form.xml
>>
>> For your convenience, we have also created an alt-diff file that will
>> allow you to more easily view changes where text has been deleted or
>> moved:
>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/authors/rfc9446-alt-diff.html
>>
>>
>> Tracking progress
>> -----------------
>>
>> The details of the AUTH48 status of your document are here:
>>    https://www.rfc-editor.org/auth48/rfc9446
>>
>> Please let us know if you have any questions.
>>
>> Thank you for your cooperation,
>>
>> RFC Editor
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC9446 (draft-farrell-tenyearsafter-05)
>>
>> Title            : Reflections on Ten Years Past The Snowden Revelations
>> Author(s)        : S. Farrell, F. Badii, B. Schneier, S. Bellovin
>> WG Chair(s)      :
>> Area Director(s) :
>>
>>