Re: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones
"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Tue, 16 November 2010 14:24 UTC
Return-Path: <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3DF3A6C7F for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 06:24:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.878
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.878 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.371, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JegxfaA3B6BB for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 06:24:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smail2.alcatel.fr (smail2.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.57]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1373A6C73 for <avt@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 06:24:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB01.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB01.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.61]) by smail2.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id oAGEJOmm005418 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for <avt@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:25:10 +0100
Received: from FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.46]) by FRMRSSXCHHUB01.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.61]) with mapi; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:25:10 +0100
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>, "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:25:05 +0100
Thread-Topic: Adoption of new milestones
Thread-Index: AcuB+tHTdl113lt0S4mJWz/5TRVeTQACMmqgAOVJcrAAAEvVgA==
Message-ID: <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE21E03B2BD@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE21E03AD3E@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE21E03AD3F@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE21E03B2B2@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE21E03B2B2@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 155.132.188.80
Subject: Re: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:24:30 -0000
(As WG chair) I realise I've confused my deadlines here, and prempted the deadline I set, so you have a few more days to respond on all of these. Keith > -----Original Message----- > From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) > Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 2:22 PM > To: DRAGE, Keith (Keith); avt@ietf.org > Subject: RE: Adoption of new milestones > > (As WG co-chair) > > For: > > > > - RTP Header extension for mixer to client audio level > > > indication as proposed standard > > > > - RTP Header extension for client to mixer audio level > > > indication as proposed standard > > > > - Guidelines for the use of Variable Bit Rate Audio with > > > Secure RTP as informational (or possibly BCP) > > I have received no comments to these being adopted beyond > those seen in the face-to-face meeting in Beijing, and Roni > and I will seek to set these milestones with the Area Director. > > If the authors of the related drafts have views on how long > these should take for WG review, closing of open issues and > WGLC, then please inform the WG chairs (be pessimistic rather > than optimistic). > > For: > > > > - RTCP indication for retransmission suppression as > > > proposed standard > > > > there is discussion still ongoing on the list. I propose to > let that discussion continue for a few days before the chairs > come to a conclusion on the result. > > regards > > Keith > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: avt-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:avt-bounces@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of > > DRAGE, Keith (Keith) > > Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 12:52 AM > > To: avt@ietf.org > > Subject: Re: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones > > > > I neglected to put a deadline on this. > > > > Please respond to the chairs by close of business on Friday > November > > 19th. > > > > regards > > > > Keith > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: avt-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:avt-bounces@ietf.org] On > > Behalf Of > > > DRAGE, Keith (Keith) > > > Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 11:48 PM > > > To: avt@ietf.org > > > Subject: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones > > > > > > (As AVT WG cochair) > > > > > > We are looking to see if we should adopt a number of new > > milestones in > > > AVT. This is the adoption of the milestone, not the selection and > > > adoption of an particular draft to fulfil that milestone > > (that comes > > > later). > > > > > > There are four potential new milestones: > > > > > > - RTP Header extension for mixer to client audio level > > > indication as proposed standard > > > - RTP Header extension for client to mixer audio level > > > indication as proposed standard > > > - RTCP indication for retransmission suppression as > > > proposed standard > > > - Guidelines for the use of Variable Bit Rate Audio with > > > Secure RTP as informational (or possibly BCP) > > > > > > We took a brief show of hands in the meeting room in > Beijing to see > > > that there was a community that would support the work, and > > to see if > > > others thought that these either should not be performed or > > interfered > > > with the existing workload. So if you wish to add your opinion to > > > these please: > > > > > > For each of the above proposals indicate to the chairs at > > > avt-chairs@tools.ietf.org (or to the list if you wish) if: > > > > > > A) you are prepared to support the work in AVT by reviews, > > > comments proposed text or other appropriate means. > > > > > > B) you believe creation of this milestone is either > > > inappropriate or will have a detrimental impact on > > resources available > > > to other work in AVT. > > > > > > If you already represented your view in the meeting room > in Beijing > > > (or by Jabber), or do not wish to indicate eother A) or B), > > you do not > > > need to respond. > > > > > > There are candidate author drafts for all of these > > milestones if you > > > wish to review the potential work. > > > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ivov-avt-slic/ > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lennox-avt-rtp-audio-le > > > vel-exthdr/ > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-avt-retransmission-s > > > upression-rtp/ > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-perkins-avt-srtp-vbr-audio/ > > > > > > regards > > > > > > Keith > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Audio/Video Transport Working Group > > > avt@ietf.org > > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Audio/Video Transport Working Group > > avt@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt > >
- Re: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones Ali C. Begen (abegen)
- [AVT] Adoption of new milestones DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones Van Caenegem, Tom (Tom)
- Re: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones Glen Zorn
- Re: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones Qin Wu
- Re: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones Qin Wu
- Re: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones Colin Perkins
- Re: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones Van Caenegem, Tom (Tom)
- Re: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones Qin Wu
- Re: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones Qin Wu
- Re: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones Van Caenegem, Tom (Tom)
- Re: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones DRAGE, Keith (Keith)