Re: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones

"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Tue, 16 November 2010 14:24 UTC

Return-Path: <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F3DF3A6C7F for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 06:24:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.878
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.878 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.371, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JegxfaA3B6BB for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 06:24:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smail2.alcatel.fr (smail2.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.57]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1373A6C73 for <avt@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 06:24:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB01.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB01.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.61]) by smail2.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id oAGEJOmm005418 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for <avt@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:25:10 +0100
Received: from FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.46]) by FRMRSSXCHHUB01.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.61]) with mapi; Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:25:10 +0100
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>, "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 15:25:05 +0100
Thread-Topic: Adoption of new milestones
Thread-Index: AcuB+tHTdl113lt0S4mJWz/5TRVeTQACMmqgAOVJcrAAAEvVgA==
Message-ID: <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE21E03B2BD@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE21E03AD3E@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE21E03AD3F@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE21E03B2B2@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE21E03B2B2@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 155.132.188.80
Subject: Re: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 14:24:30 -0000

(As WG chair)

I realise I've confused my deadlines here, and prempted the deadline I set, so you have a few more days to respond on all of these. 

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith) 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2010 2:22 PM
> To: DRAGE, Keith (Keith); avt@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: Adoption of new milestones
> 
> (As WG co-chair)
> 
> For:
> 
> > > -	RTP Header extension for mixer to client audio level 
> > > indication as proposed standard
> 
> > > -	RTP Header extension for client to mixer audio level 
> > > indication as proposed standard
> 
> > > -	Guidelines for the use of Variable Bit Rate Audio with 
> > > Secure RTP as informational (or possibly BCP)
> 
> I have received no comments to these being adopted beyond 
> those seen in the face-to-face meeting in Beijing, and Roni 
> and I will seek to set these milestones with the Area Director. 
> 
> If the authors of the related drafts have views on how long 
> these should take for WG review, closing of open issues and 
> WGLC, then please inform the WG chairs (be pessimistic rather 
> than optimistic).
> 
> For:
> 
> > > -	RTCP indication for retransmission suppression as 
> > > proposed standard
> >
> 
> there is discussion still ongoing on the list. I propose to 
> let that discussion continue for a few days before the chairs 
> come to a conclusion on the result.
> 
> regards
> 
> Keith
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: avt-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:avt-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of 
> > DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
> > Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 12:52 AM
> > To: avt@ietf.org
> > Subject: Re: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones
> > 
> > I neglected to put a deadline on this.
> > 
> > Please respond to the chairs by close of business on Friday 
> November 
> > 19th.
> > 
> > regards
> > 
> > Keith
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: avt-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:avt-bounces@ietf.org] On
> > Behalf Of
> > > DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
> > > Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 11:48 PM
> > > To: avt@ietf.org
> > > Subject: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones
> > > 
> > > (As AVT WG cochair)
> > > 
> > > We are looking to see if we should adopt a number of new
> > milestones in
> > > AVT. This is the adoption of the milestone, not the selection and 
> > > adoption of an particular draft to fulfil that milestone
> > (that comes
> > > later).
> > > 
> > > There are four potential new milestones:
> > > 
> > > -	RTP Header extension for mixer to client audio level 
> > > indication as proposed standard
> > > -	RTP Header extension for client to mixer audio level 
> > > indication as proposed standard
> > > -	RTCP indication for retransmission suppression as 
> > > proposed standard
> > > -	Guidelines for the use of Variable Bit Rate Audio with 
> > > Secure RTP as informational (or possibly BCP)
> > > 
> > > We took a brief show of hands in the meeting room in 
> Beijing to see 
> > > that there was a community that would support the work, and
> > to see if
> > > others thought that these either should not be performed or
> > interfered
> > > with the existing workload. So if you wish to add your opinion to 
> > > these please:
> > > 
> > > For each of the above proposals indicate to the chairs at 
> > > avt-chairs@tools.ietf.org (or to the list if you wish) if:
> > > 
> > > A)	you are prepared to support the work in AVT by reviews, 
> > > comments proposed text or other appropriate means.
> > > 
> > > B)	you believe creation of this milestone is either 
> > > inappropriate or will have a detrimental impact on
> > resources available
> > > to other work in AVT.
> > > 
> > > If you already represented your view in the meeting room 
> in Beijing 
> > > (or by Jabber), or do not wish to indicate eother A) or B),
> > you do not
> > > need to respond.
> > > 
> > > There are candidate author drafts for all of these
> > milestones if you
> > > wish to review the potential work.
> > > 
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ivov-avt-slic/
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lennox-avt-rtp-audio-le
> > > vel-exthdr/
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-avt-retransmission-s
> > > upression-rtp/
> > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-perkins-avt-srtp-vbr-audio/
> > > 
> > > regards
> > > 
> > > Keith
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Audio/Video Transport Working Group
> > > avt@ietf.org
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
> > > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Audio/Video Transport Working Group
> > avt@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
> >