Re: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones

"DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com> Fri, 12 November 2010 00:51 UTC

Return-Path: <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: avt@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D423A682D for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:51:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.09 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.159, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B2P3eNbE1pf2 for <avt@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:51:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smail2.alcatel.fr (smail2.alcatel.fr [64.208.49.57]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5135B3A67EE for <avt@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:51:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from FRMRSSXCHHUB01.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com (FRMRSSXCHHUB01.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com [135.120.45.61]) by smail2.alcatel.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/ICT) with ESMTP id oAC0pcfr028941 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT) for <avt@ietf.org>; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 01:51:38 +0100
Received: from FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.46]) by FRMRSSXCHHUB01.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com ([135.120.45.61]) with mapi; Fri, 12 Nov 2010 01:51:38 +0100
From: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>
To: "avt@ietf.org" <avt@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 01:51:35 +0100
Thread-Topic: Adoption of new milestones
Thread-Index: AcuB+tHTdl113lt0S4mJWz/5TRVeTQACMmqg
Message-ID: <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE21E03AD3F@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
References: <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE21E03AD3E@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
In-Reply-To: <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE21E03AD3E@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 155.132.188.80
Subject: Re: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones
X-BeenThere: avt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Audio/Video Transport Working Group <avt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/avt>
List-Post: <mailto:avt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt>, <mailto:avt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:51:17 -0000

I neglected to put a deadline on this.

Please respond to the chairs by close of business on Friday November 19th.

regards

Keith 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: avt-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:avt-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
> Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 11:48 PM
> To: avt@ietf.org
> Subject: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones
> 
> (As AVT WG cochair)
> 
> We are looking to see if we should adopt a number of new 
> milestones in AVT. This is the adoption of the milestone, not 
> the selection and adoption of an particular draft to fulfil 
> that milestone (that comes later). 
> 
> There are four potential new milestones:
> 
> -	RTP Header extension for mixer to client audio level 
> indication as proposed standard
> -	RTP Header extension for client to mixer audio level 
> indication as proposed standard
> -	RTCP indication for retransmission suppression as 
> proposed standard
> -	Guidelines for the use of Variable Bit Rate Audio with 
> Secure RTP as informational (or possibly BCP)
> 
> We took a brief show of hands in the meeting room in Beijing 
> to see that there was a community that would support the 
> work, and to see if others thought that these either should 
> not be performed or interfered with the existing workload. So 
> if you wish to add your opinion to these please:
> 
> For each of the above proposals indicate to the chairs at 
> avt-chairs@tools.ietf.org (or to the list if you wish) if:
> 
> A)	you are prepared to support the work in AVT by reviews, 
> comments proposed text or other appropriate means.
> 
> B)	you believe creation of this milestone is either 
> inappropriate or will have a detrimental impact on resources 
> available to other work in AVT.
> 
> If you already represented your view in the meeting room in 
> Beijing (or by Jabber), or do not wish to indicate eother A) 
> or B), you do not need to respond.
> 
> There are candidate author drafts for all of these milestones 
> if you wish to review the potential work.
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ivov-avt-slic/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lennox-avt-rtp-audio-le
> vel-exthdr/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-avt-retransmission-s
> upression-rtp/
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-perkins-avt-srtp-vbr-audio/
> 
> regards
> 
> Keith
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Working Group
> avt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
>