Re: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones

(As WG co-chair)

For:

> > -	RTP Header extension for mixer to client audio level 
> > indication as proposed standard

> > -	RTP Header extension for client to mixer audio level 
> > indication as proposed standard

> > -	Guidelines for the use of Variable Bit Rate Audio with 
> > Secure RTP as informational (or possibly BCP) 

I have received no comments to these being adopted beyond those seen in the face-to-face meeting in Beijing, and Roni and I will seek to set these milestones with the Area Director. 

If the authors of the related drafts have views on how long these should take for WG review, closing of open issues and WGLC, then please inform the WG chairs (be pessimistic rather than optimistic).

For:

> > -	RTCP indication for retransmission suppression as 
> > proposed standard
>

there is discussion still ongoing on the list. I propose to let that discussion continue for a few days before the chairs come to a conclusion on the result.

regards

Keith

> -----Original Message-----
> From: avt-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:avt-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 12:52 AM
> To: avt@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones
> 
> I neglected to put a deadline on this.
> 
> Please respond to the chairs by close of business on Friday 
> November 19th.
> 
> regards
> 
> Keith 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: avt-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:avt-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> Behalf Of 
> > DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
> > Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2010 11:48 PM
> > To: avt@ietf.org
> > Subject: [AVT] Adoption of new milestones
> > 
> > (As AVT WG cochair)
> > 
> > We are looking to see if we should adopt a number of new 
> milestones in 
> > AVT. This is the adoption of the milestone, not the selection and 
> > adoption of an particular draft to fulfil that milestone 
> (that comes 
> > later).
> > 
> > There are four potential new milestones:
> > 
> > -	RTP Header extension for mixer to client audio level 
> > indication as proposed standard
> > -	RTP Header extension for client to mixer audio level 
> > indication as proposed standard
> > -	RTCP indication for retransmission suppression as 
> > proposed standard
> > -	Guidelines for the use of Variable Bit Rate Audio with 
> > Secure RTP as informational (or possibly BCP)
> > 
> > We took a brief show of hands in the meeting room in Beijing to see 
> > that there was a community that would support the work, and 
> to see if 
> > others thought that these either should not be performed or 
> interfered 
> > with the existing workload. So if you wish to add your opinion to 
> > these please:
> > 
> > For each of the above proposals indicate to the chairs at 
> > avt-chairs@tools.ietf.org (or to the list if you wish) if:
> > 
> > A)	you are prepared to support the work in AVT by reviews, 
> > comments proposed text or other appropriate means.
> > 
> > B)	you believe creation of this milestone is either 
> > inappropriate or will have a detrimental impact on 
> resources available 
> > to other work in AVT.
> > 
> > If you already represented your view in the meeting room in Beijing 
> > (or by Jabber), or do not wish to indicate eother A) or B), 
> you do not 
> > need to respond.
> > 
> > There are candidate author drafts for all of these 
> milestones if you 
> > wish to review the potential work.
> > 
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ivov-avt-slic/
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-lennox-avt-rtp-audio-le
> > vel-exthdr/
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-wu-avt-retransmission-s
> > upression-rtp/
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-perkins-avt-srtp-vbr-audio/
> > 
> > regards
> > 
> > Keith
> > _______________________________________________
> > Audio/Video Transport Working Group
> > avt@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> Audio/Video Transport Working Group
> avt@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/avt
> 