[babel] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-babel-applicability-07: (with COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 05 August 2019 15:22 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: babel@ietf.org
Delivered-To: babel@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D9B12004A; Mon, 5 Aug 2019 08:22:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alissa Cooper via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-babel-applicability@ietf.org, Donald Eastlake <d3e3e3@gmail.com>, babel-chairs@ietf.org, d3e3e3@gmail.com, babel@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.99.1
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Message-ID: <156501857349.24525.10768788622753886835.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2019 08:22:53 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/babel/yjKodq0yXjS99xdGMwfzWYaVByw>
Subject: [babel] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-babel-applicability-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: babel@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: "A list for discussion of the Babel Routing Protocol." <babel.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/babel/>
List-Post: <mailto:babel@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/babel>, <mailto:babel-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2019 15:22:54 -0000

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-babel-applicability-07: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-babel-applicability/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for writing this.

I find the use of "we" and "our" odd for a consensus document. I think the
document would be improved if these used the document itself as the subject
(e.g., "this document describes" instead of "we describe").

I think the claims made in the bulleted list at the end of Section 2.2 need
citations.