IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Banana] Reaching Consensus on Problem Statement

Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com> Fri, 03 February 2017 10:15 UTC

Return-Path: <jim@rfc1035.com>
X-Original-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: banana@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9781129BCE for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 02:15:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-3.199, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5fRJRqYAvbsN for <banana@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 02:15:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shaun.rfc1035.com (smtp.v6.rfc1035.com [IPv6:2001:4b10:100:7::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D529A127078 for <banana@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 02:15:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gromit.rfc1035.com (gromit.rfc1035.com [195.54.233.69]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shaun.rfc1035.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDA42242125A; Fri, 3 Feb 2017 10:15:53 +0000 (UTC)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
From: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
In-Reply-To: <CDC5B9AE-3F25-4C74-ACE7-A7A8060A84A9@trammell.ch>
Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:15:53 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D13DA41A-9518-4562-A3DD-397D8869300D@rfc1035.com>
References: <EE162993-F96F-458A-846C-D722EEF7A3B8@gmail.com> <CDC5B9AE-3F25-4C74-ACE7-A7A8060A84A9@trammell.ch>
To: Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/banana/07CXNkvG3BbifQ6zS2mXcwtzZ1A>
Cc: Margaret Cullen <margaretw42@gmail.com>, banana@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Banana] Reaching Consensus on Problem Statement
X-BeenThere: banana@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Bandwidth Aggregation for interNet Access: Discussion of bandwidth aggregation solutions based on IETF technologies." <banana.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/banana/>
List-Post: <mailto:banana@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/banana>, <mailto:banana-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2017 10:15:57 -0000

> On 3 Feb 2017, at 10:11, Brian Trammell <ietf@trammell.ch> wrote:
> 
> Thanks a lot for pulling this together -- this, I think, concisely and accurately reflects the intersection of the problem spaces discussed in the BoF that we should explore further.

+1

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email