Re: [BEHAVE] RFC6147 and RFC7208 interoperability issues

[Klaus Frank <[e-mail]>]

🙄This is just anti DNS64 all together... Can we assume for the sake of 
this discussion that one actually wants to use the DNS64 resolver?

On 2022-02-07 03:55, Keith Moore wrote:
> On 2/6/22 21:48, Klaus Frank wrote:
>
>> Also the noted "smtp server and DNS may not be under the same 
>> management" is also one of the reasons why it should be within DNS64. 
>
> Disagree.  One of the general problem with DNS, BTW, is that the 
> people who operate the DNS servers and the people who operate the 
> applications that require correct DNS configuration are often not the 
> same people, and often don't even work with the same company. So DNS 
> already gets out-of-sync with reality too often as it is.
>
> If a NAT takes it upon itself to alter DNS records in flight, there's 
> even more potential for the DNS to get out-of-sync with reality, and 
> three different parties that have to potentially be reconciled to fix 
> the problem.
>
> Of course this is a big reason that applications are increasingly 
> using DoH or DoT to query a trusted server whenever possible - to 
> minimize the potential for some third party to have screwed things up.
>
> Keith
>
>