Re: [bess] VXLAN BGP EVPN Question

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Thu, 23 April 2020 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bess@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6263A0A93 for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:30:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OqIweYga_Twl for <bess@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd30.google.com (mail-io1-xd30.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d30]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 998E13A0A92 for <bess@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd30.google.com with SMTP id e9so6786772iok.9 for <bess@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:30:31 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=hKfiepm/gaZNIt4Ty3jItuGDpxpoAw5EoM0hUFDS+OU=; b=qcjGNZ5FU+JYiH3kBvRNYT+k+t28Dm6FGMJnqmpUtQocaFC5BArFMF+4jFkL2SjNJo rXcc9sQ5xF/erU3iA0yKoCtkLxEzVmyM72a/wSpMtdkha20ydK6aAXa2QA5imn0uSpM5 QZrj07ovG5Wyp0NADQtmcLRLxtLuQrmIRIIge7TAaxCN7S5//daXb8ZwXLKUETdRO6iY /TGnElEFcItao93pFdcbkbZtctnzvsZSaCzuhO9pO1EVSPyEu1ZKefGo+GZIwcinefbB okBVDrXrx/fJ90lCZYfAMu5iCeWilBdrmFOGMcuVlTw6zUjh41eNZmykmKjjezWE+b7B mCOA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=hKfiepm/gaZNIt4Ty3jItuGDpxpoAw5EoM0hUFDS+OU=; b=n1w698XgW6fbiA+4ux3zmSE80fMjXTLK5+M3WgOO78Sh0SXNtgVOSHZt76kMlCg2SF b5NAfXuEiRPpl3viQPI7KnR33ga3PAumRuDryIUaRoQsswb6Mf1ushE+xJI9joiB6tM0 P7eFltiPVy1mo1j/pmT1lwwvNEV0NexwtqJYUJRaZHnS8/gc+bRFyO64gIZwcg6lwmkm kI9NUxfAyXVxVFYWbqz7mNap2XpyCc+KP90q+pQFl3CqIwRr37ac5ZMg8u66mz3ElWRV 009beOyk8FWoQMTf9fIys8qCbFfFxQ1rp+BOqqyFpFBkEvFM8UvGTo/4gCruQ2gFJpD9 z9qw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYTp5SAhgiTDkdg9RZ4+cF4pFO9N/OOnNvRed8PfvanlM3DdZAW 6Q3orbwGU00WvWY/+p0sK0OpNLBgt1KKXYcw9xg6MSdgdTo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypLjURlFJKztTiWTl0Ph745sdiN0VgtT7CUKRSkt6EtfvSjdUTSLt6SCero5HKbTiTyQXqar3YilQSBxqkTq3Os=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:e412:: with SMTP id u18mr3977088iog.95.1587655830556; Thu, 23 Apr 2020 08:30:30 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CABNhwV1kPDhRcuqS8GOpTiKoyk_QHKVXa582JUznLvKfXQe54w@mail.gmail.com> <CABNhwV352jKVSu2Jwf9dRgzmjc05gvmLo_CL5EGuR12en-7Z_A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CABNhwV352jKVSu2Jwf9dRgzmjc05gvmLo_CL5EGuR12en-7Z_A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 11:30:19 -0400
Message-ID: <CABNhwV0Tww-8SxBocQBZ4vuj7DMW44ymN4ux4h1JoaYNENnioQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: BESS <bess@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ce548a05a3f6ed37"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bess/gMQkWC9vAi3kINWEqzV3lJFnT_A>
Subject: Re: [bess] VXLAN BGP EVPN Question
X-BeenThere: bess@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: BGP-Enabled ServiceS working group discussion list <bess.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bess/>
List-Post: <mailto:bess@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess>, <mailto:bess-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2020 15:30:33 -0000

Slight clarification with the arp traffic.  What I meant was broadcast
traffic translated into BUM traffic with the EVPN architecture is there any
way to reduce the amount of BUM traffic with a data center design
requirement with vlan anywhere sprawl with 1000s of type 2 Mac mobility
routes being learned between all the leaf VTEPs.

The elimination of broadcast is a tremendous gain and with broadcast
suppression of multicast that does help but it would be nice to not have
such massive Mac tables type 2 route churn chatter with a conversation
learning where only active flows are are in the type 2 rib.

Kind regards

Gyan

On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 6:47 PM Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> In the description of the vxlan BGP evpn scenario has a typo on the
> multisite feature segmented LSP inter pod with the RT auto rewrite which is
> similar to MPLS inter-as option b not a.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Gyan
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 5:57 PM Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> All
>>
>> Had a question related to vxlan BGP EVPN architecture specifications
>> defined in BGP EVPN NVO3 overlay RFC 8365 and VXLAN data plane RFC 7348.
>>
>> In a Data Center environment where you have a multiple PODs individual
>> fabrics per POD connected via a super spine extension using a Multi site
>> feature doing auto rewrite of RTs to stitch the NVE tunnel between pods
>> similar to inter-as option A.
>>
>> So in this scenario where you have vlan sprawl everywhere with L2 and L3
>> VNIs everywhere as if it were a a single L2 domain.  The topology is a
>> typical vxlan spine leaf topology where the L3 leafs are the TOR switch so
>> very small physical  L2 fault domain. So I was wondering if with the vxlan
>> architecture if this feature below is possible or if their is a way to do
>> so in the current specification.
>>
>> Cisco use to have a DC product called “fabric path” which was based on
>> conversation learning.
>>
>> Is there any way with existing vxlan BGP evpn specification or maybe
>> future enhancement to have a Mac conversation learning capability so that
>> only the active mac’s that are part of a conversations flow are the mac
>> that are flooded throughout the vxlan fabric.  That would really help
>> tremendously with arp storms so if new arp entries are generated locally on
>> a leaf they are not flooded through the fabric unless their are active
>> flows between leafs.
>>
>> Also is there a way to filter type 2 Mac mobility routes between leaf
>> switches at the control plane level based on remote vtep or maybe other
>> parameters.  That would also reduce arp storms BUM traffic.
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Gyan
>> --
>>
>> Gyan  Mishra
>>
>> Network Engineering & Technology
>>
>> Verizon
>>
>> Silver Spring, MD 20904
>>
>> Phone: 301 502-1347
>>
>> Email: gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>
> Gyan  Mishra
>
> Network Engineering & Technology
>
> Verizon
>
> Silver Spring, MD 20904
>
> Phone: 301 502-1347
>
> Email: gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com
>
>
>
> --

Gyan  Mishra

Network Engineering & Technology

Verizon

Silver Spring, MD 20904

Phone: 301 502-1347

Email: gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com