Re: [bfcpbis] Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-04

"Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com> Mon, 12 October 2015 22:26 UTC

Return-Path: <gsalguei@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 932DC1A903A for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:26:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -13.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_111=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_15=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HTML_ATTACH=0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lpiF1PSbrrdO for <bfcpbis@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:26:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61E3C1A9032 for <bfcpbis@ietf.org>; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:26:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=235126; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1444688763; x=1445898363; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=583Kvo8A1xliDN2/ZAi0aL9MY78BmNBv97g0w22eVbU=; b=MGmAoS3FD7kALUzsoW6PkoLxWpS/masvhjsF23L3Ei8QCOUwSwfWmguI sTZG5T5McQpkr/snnHHx7C9yjJw5zO404cHfk0k3EQY7C5PTuaupcss9R HMWRs87nO/k7SrS/ph+97EvVvzDw/XeDHLmym2r69Fg7TrBg2v+mKi0UZ I=;
X-Files: draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt, Diff_ draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-04.txt - draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05.txt.html, ATT00001.txt : 30372, 135599, 3815
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C4AwAqMhxW/4ENJK1bAoMmVF8PBoUwrAuMQg6BVwMXAQuCcIEvWzVKAhyBHDgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhCYBAQEDAQEBARcBCAoaDhIBBgsFCwIBCBEDAQIBFgoBCQICAh8GCx0IAgQKBAUOiAsDCggNrDGFHIkTDYUZAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBF4ZzghCBaIEGglCBTwsRAQYJHAsKDQQHBgMKC4JLMYEUAQSHOARWhHuBMYVggUgGJwGCTYFhaoJwglpDgXQFgVMVM4NyhzCFeX+DWoNuAREOAUOBYC4ggVRxAYUpBxcjgQYBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,675,1437436800"; d="txt'?html'217?scan'217,208,217";a="35033201"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Oct 2015 22:25:59 +0000
Received: from XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com (xch-rcd-006.cisco.com [173.37.102.16]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9CMPxN2028175 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 12 Oct 2015 22:26:00 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-009.cisco.com (173.36.7.19) by XCH-RCD-006.cisco.com (173.37.102.16) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 17:25:46 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-009.cisco.com ([173.36.7.19]) by XCH-ALN-009.cisco.com ([173.36.7.19]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Mon, 12 Oct 2015 17:25:46 -0500
From: "Gonzalo Salgueiro (gsalguei)" <gsalguei@cisco.com>
To: "Charles Eckel (eckelcu)" <eckelcu@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [bfcpbis] Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-04
Thread-Index: AQHQ24v2tJFpZs3eTEKDBmLDmBoP2p4WQpSAgFLKyQCAAAlNgA==
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 22:25:46 +0000
Message-ID: <EC77F9D4-AA75-4F09-8537-4AEF1D28028C@cisco.com>
References: <D1FB8E67.55AD7%eckelcu@cisco.com> <676DBA71-E49F-4D86-B82E-8263D70B6C35@cisco.com> <D2417899.5B462%eckelcu@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D2417899.5B462%eckelcu@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.231.13]
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="_004_EC77F9D4AA754F0985374AEF1D28028Cciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bfcpbis/HbZGSvZpnYf5_760sV-jONnqGZw>
Cc: "Ram Mohan R \(rmohanr\)" <rmohanr@cisco.com>, "bfcpbis@ietf.org" <bfcpbis@ietf.org>, "alissa@cooperw.in" <alissa@cooperw.in>, Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
Subject: Re: [bfcpbis] Review of draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-04
X-BeenThere: bfcpbis@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: BFCPBIS working group discussion list <bfcpbis.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bfcpbis/>
List-Post: <mailto:bfcpbis@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bfcpbis>, <mailto:bfcpbis-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2015 22:26:12 -0000

Hi Charles - 

We have sent the latest version of BFCPoWS draft (draft-ietf-bfcpbis-bfcp-websocket-05) and diffs addressing Christer’s comments.  We are awaiting his confirmation that these changes look ok.  Once that is done we are ready to publish the drafts.  I’ve attached the draft and diffs here again, in case they are needed.  This includes a request to review the complementary draft he requested (draft-ram-bfcpbis-sdp-ws-uri-00) be split off from the original document.

As far as the authors are concerned there are currently no open issues.  Not sure a discussion of these drafts is necessary, but we are happy to discuss them in any capacity the WG deems necessary.

Cheers,

Gonzalo