Re: [bmwg] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-04

Timothy Winters <tim@qacafe.com> Mon, 08 January 2024 18:50 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@qacafe.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50B4BC18DB8C for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 10:50:20 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=qacafe.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dLfi8B8kK8WU for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 10:50:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102a.google.com (mail-pj1-x102a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102a]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09193C18DBA6 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 10:50:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102a.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-28cec7ae594so1884945a91.3 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 10:50:04 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qacafe.com; s=google; t=1704739804; x=1705344604; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=xCZ7JFamEyUYej3HJCLpm+m5j0oQ2OmLXlu32HU3764=; b=QUbWwzeFwbMsPRNWvEc2ukb7DuAYfi3slRFHvfBL0bkiXbT8XWmcGjGGkyTUqTchVc XqR1Jg+PBvDFxM/2OikUHfMVKcIGNjDGwF4awri+idNC+Irxz0nByi2nM+ngRhB7NbaK WlijLWXbHuKiF5nk+vs9TQmcIFt/Awo0luYsY=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1704739804; x=1705344604; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=xCZ7JFamEyUYej3HJCLpm+m5j0oQ2OmLXlu32HU3764=; b=tZBHuCJ8roUezRqR1I6vBtIR3+6WhIkHLngsT4DqnnxOROAoD0w6jic6TkBf0HtmTj CMDXc5YgCbvIgPLAP3GwPfvwR5XH3BUyZiEr5FV9tQNco1W38Xo1+WMSCICy+/ZEWUPl ow7MO/aLxw+f6UA75E1wnAmayQi2nDprx5qO3QtondnGUUrNAJBH5N7U70/4HyEqTLDj 6DZvX4qmbDmb49a11bGksBcbhljEEgyDaCwb3+wtxO0ReyPWAkpDPmnJOZ8pzkphEHgh 9piE68kgzsg23YKySkP1JzEN6jLAj1Ed6rUhu7DkKyZrxXXXJsC9iBDcZc9TT8qxOdRW Bj6Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzvhQya44jFF5QBal/z7fjdLtx3WVU2/SBnMSsgpyUzexgFja7r rcKCv7YjzPVVVPtpR4ivfqve6GsqP1GfsDlRET1IIaZOBHBQEg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFhkcImdCCdwF6zKrzK4FVoHDKARpZJhsblj6i8hOCjc311tgiIuFvuZmAnNX2DlEHH1kYqIDQQB/xj+H2CeZY=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:400f:b0:28d:1f14:82e3 with SMTP id u15-20020a17090a400f00b0028d1f1482e3mr1888484pjc.16.1704739803837; Mon, 08 Jan 2024 10:50:03 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <15D9A7A1-6011-46B2-89C5-7F740A0AFCD9@encrypted.net> <147F6665B1980A4496AE5D06F45C002A02573BA894@hold.ahol.co.hu> <CAJgLMKsXQYR319qGBYLP6PcaENMctZmf0RhmLTi3FcgYiVO1cg@mail.gmail.com> <ae23a3b9-f27b-4920-8262-2279cd1e752b@hit.bme.hu>
In-Reply-To: <ae23a3b9-f27b-4920-8262-2279cd1e752b@hit.bme.hu>
From: Timothy Winters <tim@qacafe.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 13:49:52 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJgLMKuFHcVRVHrf7iXDfB8aU1keV2HP7jaC6+dSBWtYwPTUvA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gábor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
Cc: bmwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000714c0d060e73aac1"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/6M5-YgJNJVcD_Dla817ATnBcIho>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-04
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2024 18:50:20 -0000

Hi Gábor,

I think that would resolve my nit nicely.  Thanks for you work on the
document.

~Tim

On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 10:49 AM Gábor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu> wrote:

> Hi Tim,
>
> Thank you very much for your review and nit picking.
>
> I have been contemplating where the definition should be added. It
> definitely belongs to Section 3, and perhaps the simplest solution is to
> add it to the end of Section 3.1 as follows:
>
>    One further definition is used in the text of this document:
>
>    *  Black box testing: It is a testing approach when the Tester is not
>       aware of the details of the internal structure and operation of
>       the DUT.  It can send input to the DUT and observe the output of
>       the DUT.
>
> What do you think of it?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Gábor
>
>
>
> 1/3/2024 9:43 PM keltezéssel, Timothy Winters írta:
>
> Hi BMWG,
>
> I reviewed the document and think it's ready to publish with one nit.
>
> "black box" is a term used twice in the document but it's not defined in
> the document.  While I know what it means it may make sense to define this
> term for novices.
>
> ~Tim
>
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 11:10 AM Sandor R. Repas Dr. <RSandor@ahol.co.hu>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear BMWG Chairs and Members,
>>
>>
>>
>> I read the draft and I support it to be published as an informational RFC.
>>
>>
>>
>> Full disclosure: I am a colleague of Gabor Lencse and I use siitperf
>> measurement program for benchmarking Linux, FreeBSD and other type of
>> routers.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Sandor R. Repas
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* bmwg <bmwg-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *sbanks@encrypted.net
>> *Sent:* 2023. december 6., szerda 21:22
>> *To:* bmwg <bmwg@ietf.org>
>> *Subject:* [bmwg] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-04
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello BMWG,
>>
>>                We are starting a working group last call (WGLC) for the "Benchmarking
>> Methodology for Stateful NATxy Gateways using RFC 4814 Pseudorandom Port
>> Numbers”. It’ll start tomorrow, December 7, and run for 4 weeks, closing on
>> January 4. The extended WGLC allows for the holiday and new year breaks.
>>
>>
>>
>>                Please read the draft and express your opinion on whether
>> or not this Internet-Draft should be forwarded to the Area Directors for
>> publication and an Informational RFC. Send your comments to this list
>> (preferred), or to the co-chairs at bmwg-chairs@ietf.org.
>>
>>
>>
>> For the co-chairs,
>>
>> Sarah
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bmwg mailing list
>> bmwg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing listbmwg@ietf.orghttps://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>