Re: [bmwg] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-04

[Gábor LENCSE <[e-mail]>]

Hi Tim,

Thank you! The change is now in the XML file, it will be shown in 
version "05".

Best regards,

Gábor

1/8/2024 7:49 PM keltezéssel, Timothy Winters írta:
> Hi Gábor,
>
> I think that would resolve my nit nicely.  Thanks for you work on the 
> document.
>
> ~Tim
>
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2024 at 10:49 AM Gábor LENCSE <[e-mail]> wrote:
>
>     Hi Tim,
>
>     Thank you very much for your review and nit picking.
>
>     I have been contemplating where the definition should be added. It
>     definitely belongs to Section 3, and perhaps the simplest solution
>     is to add it to the end of Section 3.1 as follows:
>
>         One further definition is used in the text of this document:
>
>         *  Black box testing: It is a testing approach when the Tester is not
>            aware of the details of the internal structure and operation of
>            the DUT.  It can send input to the DUT and observe the output of
>            the DUT.
>
>     What do you think of it?
>
>     Best regards,
>
>     Gábor
>
>
>
>     1/3/2024 9:43 PM keltezéssel, Timothy Winters írta:
>>     Hi BMWG,
>>
>>     I reviewed the document and think it's ready to publish with one nit.
>>
>>     "black box" is a term used twice in the document but it's not
>>     defined in the document.  While I know what it means it may make
>>     sense to define this term for novices.
>>
>>     ~Tim
>>
>>     On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 11:10 AM Sandor R. Repas Dr.
>>     <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>>         Dear BMWG Chairs and Members,
>>
>>         I read the draft and I support it to be published as an
>>         informational RFC.
>>
>>         Full disclosure: I am a colleague of Gabor Lencse and I use
>>         siitperf measurement program for benchmarking Linux, FreeBSD
>>         and other type of routers.
>>
>>         Best regards,
>>
>>         Sandor R. Repas
>>
>>         *From:*bmwg <[e-mail]> *On Behalf Of
>>         *[e-mail]
>>         *Sent:* 2023. december 6., szerda 21:22
>>         *To:* bmwg <[e-mail]>
>>         *Subject:* [bmwg] WG Last Call:
>>         draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-04
>>
>>         Hello BMWG,
>>
>>         We are starting a working group last call (WGLC) for the
>>         "Benchmarking Methodology for Stateful NATxy Gateways using
>>         RFC 4814 Pseudorandom Port Numbers”. It’ll start tomorrow,
>>         December 7, and run for 4 weeks, closing on January 4. The
>>         extended WGLC allows for the holiday and new year breaks.
>>
>>
>>
>>         Please read the draft and express your opinion on whether or
>>         not this Internet-Draft should be forwarded to the Area
>>         Directors for publication and an Informational RFC. Send your
>>         comments to this list (preferred), or to the co-chairs at
>>         [e-mail].
>>
>>
>>
>>         For the co-chairs,
>>
>>         Sarah
>>
>>
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         bmwg mailing list
>>         [e-mail]
>>         https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     bmwg mailing list
>>     [e-mail]
>>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     bmwg mailing list
>     [e-mail]
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>