Re: [bmwg] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-04

Hi BMWG,

I reviewed the document and think it's ready to publish with one nit.

"black box" is a term used twice in the document but it's not defined in
the document.  While I know what it means it may make sense to define this
term for novices.

~Tim

On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 11:10 AM Sandor R. Repas Dr. <RSandor@ahol.co.hu>
wrote:

> Dear BMWG Chairs and Members,
>
>
>
> I read the draft and I support it to be published as an informational RFC.
>
>
>
> Full disclosure: I am a colleague of Gabor Lencse and I use siitperf
> measurement program for benchmarking Linux, FreeBSD and other type of
> routers.
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Sandor R. Repas
>
>
>
> *From:* bmwg <bmwg-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *sbanks@encrypted.net
> *Sent:* 2023. december 6., szerda 21:22
> *To:* bmwg <bmwg@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* [bmwg] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-04
>
>
>
> Hello BMWG,
>
>                We are starting a working group last call (WGLC) for the "Benchmarking
> Methodology for Stateful NATxy Gateways using RFC 4814 Pseudorandom Port
> Numbers”. It’ll start tomorrow, December 7, and run for 4 weeks, closing on
> January 4. The extended WGLC allows for the holiday and new year breaks.
>
>
>
>                Please read the draft and express your opinion on whether
> or not this Internet-Draft should be forwarded to the Area Directors for
> publication and an Informational RFC. Send your comments to this list
> (preferred), or to the co-chairs at bmwg-chairs@ietf.org.
>
>
>
> For the co-chairs,
>
> Sarah
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>