Re: [bmwg] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-04

Hi Tim,

Thank you very much for your review and nit picking.

I have been contemplating where the definition should be added. It 
definitely belongs to Section 3, and perhaps the simplest solution is to 
add it to the end of Section 3.1 as follows:

    One further definition is used in the text of this document:

    *  Black box testing: It is a testing approach when the Tester is not
       aware of the details of the internal structure and operation of
       the DUT.  It can send input to the DUT and observe the output of
       the DUT.

What do you think of it?

Best regards,

Gábor

1/3/2024 9:43 PM keltezéssel, Timothy Winters írta:
> Hi BMWG,
>
> I reviewed the document and think it's ready to publish with one nit.
>
> "black box" is a term used twice in the document but it's not defined 
> in the document.  While I know what it means it may make sense to 
> define this term for novices.
>
> ~Tim
>
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 11:10 AM Sandor R. Repas Dr. 
> <RSandor@ahol.co.hu> wrote:
>
>     Dear BMWG Chairs and Members,
>
>     I read the draft and I support it to be published as an
>     informational RFC.
>
>     Full disclosure: I am a colleague of Gabor Lencse and I use
>     siitperf measurement program for benchmarking Linux, FreeBSD and
>     other type of routers.
>
>     Best regards,
>
>     Sandor R. Repas
>
>     *From:*bmwg <bmwg-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of
>     *sbanks@encrypted.net
>     *Sent:* 2023. december 6., szerda 21:22
>     *To:* bmwg <bmwg@ietf.org>
>     *Subject:* [bmwg] WG Last Call:
>     draft-ietf-bmwg-benchmarking-stateful-04
>
>     Hello BMWG,
>
>     We are starting a working group last call (WGLC) for the
>     "Benchmarking Methodology for Stateful NATxy Gateways using RFC
>     4814 Pseudorandom Port Numbers”. It’ll start tomorrow, December 7,
>     and run for 4 weeks, closing on January 4. The extended WGLC
>     allows for the holiday and new year breaks.
>
>
>
>     Please read the draft and express your opinion on whether or not
>     this Internet-Draft should be forwarded to the Area Directors for
>     publication and an Informational RFC. Send your comments to this
>     list (preferred), or to the co-chairs at bmwg-chairs@ietf.org.
>
>
>
>     For the co-chairs,
>
>     Sarah
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     bmwg mailing list
>     bmwg@ietf.org
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg