IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00

Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com> Thu, 03 March 2016 06:37 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 168441B3EF2 for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 22:37:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PcjbaZlLS2oY for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 22:37:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ig0-x22c.google.com (mail-ig0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6BFB1B3EF4 for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 22:37:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ig0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id hb3so58199575igb.0 for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 22:37:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=V2GRlLy3FDK0nkr6lsAEvfe0CsL05VJpKSfeMhIClVI=; b=lZglXBRPSNulee5DuuPIF6yeR1x6b7oC0EQip5V3kCFdzS8iLcjrpykeMHRcG+Yjfw oSzlf560C4azdZ4f3U+Y14YANSrvAk0eW4+KR+BWlwmPdb/vqB0ZYedP3QW3qbGGZmeK Jw4CBHlOYaEFO5ZMnApRxBAXCzZuRh+yePMpHFPY/mJyoeBVnsyCTJjBnFNXtD5RQI4E OFO73TPGvYn9ZtbNgEmO7EaORybSHjuJuY7j2kEO8G9Wg+lRJc9XI7CT6RKYPVY0lyVN nrlr3z5Xp7+PmADhvoVBsQvwolHI/RsppKNt/porQ6q8kFD8yUCbFqLf+jl+BBeEbhVb AQqg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=V2GRlLy3FDK0nkr6lsAEvfe0CsL05VJpKSfeMhIClVI=; b=C60xa6yRWAnHETjnMocAlEolCo20IsgFlyZ/WO7uHO1gdyAbTETX1M+aisRPL4Vwo3 I/WYtFfQVUNTbWbzdBcz40yOENxmz7D6qlT1SXQ6RwoCii3jOBuoF6R/JbG4D23M9Hlx zk6nRU/DPyLAnBP0EbJqZyh/UG5ot+lJxTQCC5HUPoqRLmaKJOLsr0JrHKMyUbi3hn9D 0Z095/tGVetZW3GzxkZXLmNtcWL6qx75yPirz1HScbTxjt+UuRyJCx3NPA7Co8X7UVOw r+PvzsrZgi1Vwg3KT3qRntVQeOkvS1f+8P8KhQj8uHuhRN75eM5DC+UpNUpl33lFEvzj Okug==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJJK9OBHDBpwFelWKQe9RHnsuaV+/P5PNdsydqumrqQ+tFHV5l/WKrocqBDA4yyEfWIslIWj7J8/mSLZeQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.50.60.34 with SMTP id e2mr1441975igr.77.1456987056227; Wed, 02 Mar 2016 22:37:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.36.43.5 with HTTP; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 22:37:36 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <C639FBF3-76DF-4334-8262-C6832DF01949@mnot.net>
References: <D2FCEB47.12A6DC%jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com> <C639FBF3-76DF-4334-8262-C6832DF01949@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 17:37:36 +1100
Message-ID: <CABkgnnW_7NK4Egmjsg4g3emZcD2Z_NViNCBLitUJiBNJMY8A2A@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/-8yGPMdKMoZavWjc754QwgiXTR8>
Cc: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>, "captive-portals@ietf.org" <captive-portals@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
X-BeenThere: captive-portals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-Post: <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 06:37:38 -0000

On 3 March 2016 at 13:02, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> Regarding notifications, I think we should discuss whether it's useful to consider them as 'captive portals' or not. The techniques are similar in many cases, but there are some important differences.

I caution that this might be a case where we have to watch scope.  It
might be good to understand the methods and reasons, but those
differences could lead us down a rathole.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email