Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> Thu, 03 March 2016 02:02 UTC
Return-Path: <mnot@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D6D1B38A0 for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 18:02:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id n8WVxiIfqpKx for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 18:02:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mxout-07.mxes.net (mxout-07.mxes.net [216.86.168.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E6BC1B389A for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 18:02:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.101] (unknown [120.149.194.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 910F822E261; Wed, 2 Mar 2016 21:02:14 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\))
From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
In-Reply-To: <D2FCEB47.12A6DC%jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 13:02:11 +1100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C639FBF3-76DF-4334-8262-C6832DF01949@mnot.net>
References: <D2FCEB47.12A6DC%jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com>
To: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/foXJAWLMxVIEFjQpCbubZw2r4Xk>
Cc: "captive-portals@ietf.org" <captive-portals@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
X-BeenThere: captive-portals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-Post: <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2016 02:02:24 -0000
Hi Jason, Thanks for that, I've made some edits; see: https://github.com/mnot/I-D/commit/950dcd04dfbb Regarding notifications, I think we should discuss whether it's useful to consider them as 'captive portals' or not. The techniques are similar in many cases, but there are some important differences. Cheers, > On 3 Mar 2016, at 11:16 AM, Livingood, Jason <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com> wrote: > > Good document overall. Some comments/suggestions to consider for a 01 > update. > > 2.0, consider extending (IN CAPS): > ³...before allowing broader (but not necessarily complete) Internet > access, OR FOR OTHER PURPOSES.² > > 2.0, consider adding techniques to include HTML injection, Internet > Content Adaptation Protocol (RFC 3507), and the method described in RFC > 6108. > > 2.1, Information or Notifications, some possible additional examples: > security alerts, critical service information, account status, usage status > > 3.0, consider adding: > HTML injection, such as methods using ICAP, which runs counter to the > preferences of some users. > > 3.0, Feel free to take a look at the text in Section 12 of RFC 6108 and > use some of that text. You got the gist of it in the Non-Browser Clients > sub-section though (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6108#section-12) > > Regards > Jason > -- Mark Nottingham https://www.mnot.net/
- [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-ca… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingha… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingha… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingha… Martin Thomson
- Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingha… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingha… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingha… Dave Dolson
- Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingha… Livingood, Jason
- Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingha… Paul Ebersman
- Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingha… David Bird
- Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingha… David Bird
- Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingha… Mark Nottingham
- Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingha… John Levine
- Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingha… David Farmer