IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00

"Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com> Mon, 07 March 2016 15:38 UTC

Return-Path: <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
X-Original-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FE21B42FA for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 07:38:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.234
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.234 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_MODEMCABLE=0.768, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ID4U6TcFDtQX for <captive-portals@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 07:38:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vaadcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (vaadcmhout01.cable.comcast.com [96.114.28.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4844F1B42F9 for <captive-portals@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 07:38:36 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: 60721c4b-f79016d000007994-97-56dda07b1512
Received: from VAADCEX38.cable.comcast.com (vaadcmhoutvip.cable.comcast.com [96.115.73.56]) (using TLS with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by vaadcmhout01.cable.comcast.com (SMTP Gateway) with SMTP id 3B.51.31124.B70ADD65; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 10:38:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from VAADCEX37.cable.comcast.com (147.191.103.214) by VAADCEX38.cable.comcast.com (147.191.103.215) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1130.7; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 10:38:34 -0500
Received: from VAADCEX37.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe12:38b0]) by VAADCEX37.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::3aea:a7ff:fe12:38b0%19]) with mapi id 15.00.1130.005; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 10:38:34 -0500
From: "Livingood, Jason" <Jason_Livingood@comcast.com>
To: Dave Dolson <ddolson@sandvine.com>, Martin Thomson <martin.thomson@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
Thread-Index: AQHReIdo/WCGGu/hX0OKWSkVnY8sZQ==
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 15:38:34 +0000
Message-ID: <D3030A8C.12AEFF%jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com>
References: <D2FCEB47.12A6DC%jason_livingood@cable.comcast.com> <CABkgnnV-Nbbt3Mkh-ZOzWig7rJX32SFugkWLnx-t94bA-B__Lw@mail.gmail.com> <E8355113905631478EFF04F5AA706E9830EBCAE6@wtl-exchp-2.sandvine.com>
In-Reply-To: <E8355113905631478EFF04F5AA706E9830EBCAE6@wtl-exchp-2.sandvine.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.5.8.151023
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [68.87.29.7]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <971ACC6059A4A449A09A642024987643@cable.comcast.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Forward
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrFIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsWSUOxpoVu94G6Yweo9vBZzZzWwWmxd9pDd 4tqZf4wW6z89ZnRg8dg56y67x5IlP5k8Ni7+zurxdfN21gCWKC6blNSczLLUIn27BK6Mq+dn Mxe0MlVsfzmHtYHxKmMXIyeHhICJxL8vW6BsMYkL99azdTFycQgJbGGSuHNiIytIQkjgIKPE wr8OEPYJRolfa+JBbDYBM4m7C68wg9giAsESvYcvMIHYzAIxEqu3HmYDsYUF/CS2H2+DqgmU eHdnA5StJ9Ha3QA2n0VAReJsxw+wOK+AvcTm5XuhjjjDKPHiySmw6zgFAiSW/DkHNpQR6NLv p9ZALROXuPVkPhPEBwISS/acZ4awRSVePv4HtkAUaNnBTytZIeI6EmevP4H62EBi69J9LBC2 nMTc1/dYIGbqSCzY/YkNwnaQ6Ng3jRHC1pZYtvA11KGCEidnPoHqFZc4fGQH6wRGmVlITpqF ZNQsJKNmIRk1C8moBYysqxjlyhITU5JzM/JLSwwM9ZITk3JS9ZLzc5MTi0tA9CZGUIookvHe wbjup/shRgEORiUe3l/T74YJsSaWFVfmHmKU4GBWEuEVnQ8U4k1JrKxKLcqPLyrNSS0+xCjN waIkzst+5mqYkEB6YklqdmpqQWoRTJaJg1OqgXFaG2fnbdaTcbtM9dX9X5Zcq5fq/esoYf/W ynWinsjladzH6n+6ef0MdXvxc84srcMiu17v5d8g9Vp8wbad8rVOi95FTBV14fvqIb9Ew8Ok t4P7vYeSv7TN3QciC71OiTreU9P5xydtz7nkqqnPpucVrDn7LaNqbyduVVvjzTRfRfbYTL6A zUosxRmJhlrMRcWJAF79IsgNAwAA
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/captive-portals/WEYH0i7t0Ybob-Ws-YRQb5rYl1U>
Cc: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, "captive-portals@ietf.org" <captive-portals@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Captive-portals] Comments on draft-nottingham-capport-problem-00
X-BeenThere: captive-portals@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of issues related to captive portals <captive-portals.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/captive-portals/>
List-Post: <mailto:captive-portals@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/captive-portals>, <mailto:captive-portals-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 15:38:37 -0000

On 3/7/16, 10:08 AM, "Dave Dolson" <ddolson@sandvine.com> wrote:


>Regarding non-browser clients, even non-HTTP clients, and considering
>this is the IETF, it seems reasonable to find an IP-layer solution vs.
>an HTTP-layer solution.

+1 to that!

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email