Re: [Cbor] draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag-02 - handling of time zone offsets

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Wed, 01 July 2020 15:51 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 179953A0F55; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 08:51:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vb4zsWdoLqRm; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 08:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C710C3A0C20; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 08:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD00389C2; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 11:48:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id p9sgiQmOWoDd; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 11:48:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58774389BE; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 11:48:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B3D3DE; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 11:51:14 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de>
cc: Carsten Bormann <cabo@tzi.org>, draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag@ietf.org, cbor@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <20200701090536.mqkfjebfzhz5phls@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
References: <20200701072123.hnyhzemagtotnuyl@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de> <DD477DBD-3F3F-48FA-BADC-FF550CC3D4F7@tzi.org> <20200701090536.mqkfjebfzhz5phls@anna.jacobs.jacobs-university.de>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 11:51:13 -0400
Message-ID: <5244.1593618673@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/OOvgzGhDLK1YUmW9-PJUl-gJxGQ>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] draft-ietf-cbor-date-tag-02 - handling of time zone offsets
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 15:51:19 -0000

Juergen Schoenwaelder <j.schoenwaelder@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
    > I am not sure about Angela's passport but my passport in addition
    > states where I was born (which implies a certain time zone). I do not
    > know whether this example is useful or not, perhaps you just want to
    > say that in some use cases the time zone does not matter and this is
    > fine.

    > But on the other hand, two systems may tag an event with 1954-07-17
    > but in UTC they would be not the same dates or two systems can tag an
    > event with two different dates but they are actually the same date in
    > UTC. In distributed systems operating across many timezones, simple
    > comparisons of date values can be surprising.

The failure of the Nipponese to declare war on the USA on December 8, 1941
(they date of the attack on Pearl Habou^Hr in Japan...) is perhaps a better
example of failures to get the time zone right.

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>, Sandelman Software Works
 -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-