IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Cbor] 🔔 WGLC with request for reviews on cbor-file-magic-02

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Wed, 20 October 2021 15:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8998C3A081F for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 08:17:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aqDLlwND7OCM for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 08:17:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3:216:3eff:fe7c:d1f3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48C1E3A0805 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 08:17:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6850218078; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:18:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id WvvBNfpJarLR; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:18:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DB0718012; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:18:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B5C731; Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:17:40 -0400 (EDT)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: "cbor@ietf.org" <cbor@ietf.org>, John Mattsson <john.mattsson=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <YXApuOQsLxnLw1oF@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
References: <HE1PR0701MB3050661AAA66295ECE439A4089ED9@HE1PR0701MB3050.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <YXApuOQsLxnLw1oF@hephaistos.amsuess.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 26.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 11:17:40 -0400
Message-ID: <5821.1634743060@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/gYKplBDBhPrKdvZMNtt06ohWbDE>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] 🔔 WGLC with request for reviews on cbor-file-magic-02
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 15:17:47 -0000

Christian Amsüss <christian@amsuess.com> wrote:
    > while the minor comments have been addressed in the updates, I think
    > that these two were neither answered nor resulted in changes (not that
    > they'd necessarily would, but a change might be just as good as an
    > answer), could you comment on them?

I don't think that the document should recommend any file extension.
That's not the place of this document.

    >> - I think it would help the reader to have an examples (CBOR
    >> diagnostic + CBOR encoding) already in Sections 3.1 and 3.2.
    >> Something like the example in appendix B:
    >> "55800(1330664270(h'424F52'))" Example CBOR protocol values and the
    >> resulting bytes in the file would be even better and would really help
    >> to make the draft easy to understand.

I'm not sure I understand.
Is an example that is CBOR TAG Wrapped being asked for?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email