Re: [Cbor] 🔔 WGLC with request for reviews on cbor-network-addresses-05

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 17 July 2021 23:39 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cbor@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 162E43A272F for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 16:39:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SOLuNX9CPQXd for <cbor@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 16:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg1-x52f.google.com (mail-pg1-x52f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::52f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BD513A2730 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 16:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg1-x52f.google.com with SMTP id u14so14648868pga.11 for <cbor@ietf.org>; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 16:39:48 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Zwo7E5/CeTM2Ku70FSVPDqMeZhjFaIckI2s5gdaRQxs=; b=E75zaVITdkD3WaSbLzW6PNMW5Y8txrdzQmbvPyeL6mniGfmzEGat4acOSOYqtAEAB+ TxOmaSNponhM3YNuN+iIwmz3tG4Jxo7nZs3IueG6sQtmfuEwMNY8kS7rHZy+FswD8JrG ITc9DofiKN+YgfGnzrgiBUDLUIQMU876W66UeWEmfVR8rAvR5273m8LHa2wyxWNOrF7q cSQp7gVRvocT5wh7hY6e6N7UzION6dAU9LuDdpUsxK7dTSFaY1Id9hju2ViYbAtAD8uw ueky41JQg3vFTovw2jfCuATNlHNpO5x/juJhWiWTE8JHiiZBd4/9YOUiTUzxtc0cyVt7 0jxg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Zwo7E5/CeTM2Ku70FSVPDqMeZhjFaIckI2s5gdaRQxs=; b=Bgh7dx2cH/C4FU40qZfRaThH6WdMS9APhL/Iyjy1dJN9Olj987dyTUv51J2SwL5GCE Ou2v6yJN1bfQu3DEPYhGRvd7g9eCs08oB7BLUh8s6SXGx5h+Hbek1xmmqHK9US3jON/J oq8JvjO5A8KiMRUiM6cX9+4UVChzSM3W8NyVzOm2ji4RC1A2K+Z68foHfJvDE0yei0Rc kkhwwIOFSk8Rj1XoGWM3QePpr4PLPT6txOwo96KVH2nDbMAHJCsavMg0NuMJDBpMXpjA R/G8r+VnIdERJO6JizXmeOqdWFxuidkeHqGHmxwczcvweq1YnzkkqUZCj0cZJjoRZpdu 3rmw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533LBKdep93nMKUCkjqzKzjmwEN8i7g+Ox8h6Wn1MOegZnxkK6du 1TI+FtQTxXNzzTB5+CNNe8fRQoImBKq9uA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy2aE2lfdXgOAL7nBBuygrU3wdPKSriKv4uryqnJEnqwxpT1N3O9XCq/0b7buohA9iRK7NHGQ==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:f750:: with SMTP id f16mr17498063pgk.292.1626565187479; Sat, 17 Jul 2021 16:39:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:1188:5b01:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:1188:5b01:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f17sm15335660pjj.21.2021.07.17.16.39.45 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 17 Jul 2021 16:39:46 -0700 (PDT)
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>, cbor@ietf.org
References: <YPGg6rnN6H3feUYx@hephaistos.amsuess.com> <CALaySJK4-xQLpcaucyMb=w1b27X+VEwMQn-8ONawRJ4bJ=rWQQ@mail.gmail.com> <f2162cdb-761c-d1dd-0d10-ff98dfaa4001@gmail.com> <32191.1626561368@localhost>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <d8899839-a399-f3e6-fa3c-1fa95ee0bd61@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2021 11:39:43 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <32191.1626561368@localhost>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cbor/jKbfe9TvwjV4Wy5dJZq_jgAhdz8>
Subject: Re: [Cbor] =?utf-8?q?=F0=9F=94=94_WGLC_with_request_for_reviews_on_c?= =?utf-8?q?bor-network-addresses-05?=
X-BeenThere: cbor@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Concise Binary Object Representation \(CBOR\)" <cbor.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/cbor/>
List-Post: <mailto:cbor@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cbor>, <mailto:cbor-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2021 23:39:53 -0000

On 18-Jul-21 10:36, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 
> Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>     > This is by way of an implementation report. I have a demo implementation
>     > of RFC8992 (Autonomic IPv6 Edge Prefix Management in Large-Scale
>     > Networks) and I just made a version of it that uses Tags 52 and 54
>     > instead of the format defined in the RFC.
> 
>     > Up and running on this machine as I type. It only uses the 3rd format
>     > for each tag (address followed by prefix length) so it isn't a complete
>     > implementation, but anyway it works.**
> 
> I'm surprised in an address allocation ASA that you'd use interface format
> rather than prefix format.

Pure laziness, because it meant less change to my code, given what we
specified in RFC8992. The prefix format would work fine, but I would
need to suppress the excess bytes. Next time I feel like a little
recreational programming, I can add that.
 
> (as I write this, I realize that maybe we should name each format)

Good idea.

   Brian

> 
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>            Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
>