IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03 WG document

"Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com> Fri, 25 January 2013 05:28 UTC

Return-Path: <zali@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFA6411E80E1 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:28:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uQTJjPoMNECa for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:28:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com [173.37.86.79]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5870911E80DE for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 21:28:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=10541; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1359091704; x=1360301304; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=unIegmoTxiYGYI+3KG4TvQax1AWeEYfCzXqn7ycb66s=; b=dSzogY6CPxWmDsPmn1YKh88YDZrtI7lR62O2I/jxXTJEEbOm+Ibx0B6w irDEGps4PyqutjKG/aVSNybNo1MgDtnLtPu5DeqabbbonoN1uqhgdIgFV hIgBapbPKAbAG223aHBjHGw7wlULpJFjkAg0KD4rFBVSjiI7pIerbcBij c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAFAKYWAlGtJXG9/2dsb2JhbABEgki8DxZzgh4BAQEELV4BCA4DAwEBAQsdORQJCAIEARIIiBK+CI0Dg1phA6ZUgniBbzU
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.84,535,1355097600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="167880865"
Received: from rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com ([173.37.113.189]) by rcdn-iport-8.cisco.com with ESMTP; 25 Jan 2013 05:28:24 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com [173.36.12.86]) by rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r0P5SNBA015364 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 25 Jan 2013 05:28:23 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.10]) by xhc-aln-x12.cisco.com ([173.36.12.86]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Thu, 24 Jan 2013 23:28:23 -0600
From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
To: Rajan Rao <rrao@infinera.com>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03 WG document
Thread-Index: AQHN+rzLhH5htMp+m0CrjJ+QGe3ueQ==
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 05:28:23 +0000
Message-ID: <B6585D85A128FD47857D0FD58D8120D3B3320F@xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <650AA355E323C34D9D4AAEED952E053D3FADF8AE@SV-EXDB-PROD1.infinera.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
x-originating-ip: [10.86.247.171]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B6585D85A128FD47857D0FD58D8120D3B3320Fxmbrcdx14ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03 WG document
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2013 05:28:25 -0000

Rajan:

RFC3209 covers this. Specifically a path change is triggered on the fly (no need to wait for refresh). I am cutting and pasting some relevant text from Section 4.4.3 of RFC3209.

"An RSVP router can decide to send Path messages before its refresh

   time if the RRO in the next Path message is different from the
   previous one.  This can happen if the contents of the RRO received
   from the previous hop router changes or if this RRO is newly added to
   (or deleted from) the Path message."

Thanks

Regards…Zafar

From: Rajan Rao <rrao@infinera.com<mailto:rrao@infinera.com>>
Date: Thursday, January 24, 2013 8:03 PM
To: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com<mailto:db3546@att.com>>, "ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>" <ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03 WG document

Authors,

Question:  What is the scheme for informing endpoints for the update case (sec 2.3)?   Is it refresh mechanism or something else?

Thanks
Rajan

From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org> [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 10:48 AM
To: ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03 WG document

All,

This is start a two week poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03 a ccamp working group document. Please send email to the list indicating “yes/support” or “no/do not support”. If indicating no, please state your technical reservations with the document.

The poll ends Thursday, Feb. 7th.

Note, as stated by some of the authors, there is IPR “still being documented”.

Thanks,
Deborah and Lou

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email