Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03 WG document

Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com> Tue, 29 January 2013 09:23 UTC

Return-Path: <julien.meuric@orange.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F0221F84CE for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 01:23:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.023
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.023 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.226, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uKao3NKocURO for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 01:23:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com [195.101.245.15]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94A8321F8487 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 01:23:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 3FC717E4002 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:23:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.47]) by p-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0638C9C4001 for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:23:20 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.44]) by ftrdsmtp2.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:23:20 +0100
Received: from [10.193.71.218] ([10.193.71.218]) by ftrdmel10.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:23:20 +0100
Message-ID: <51079508.1050907@orange.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 10:23:20 +0100
From: Julien Meuric <julien.meuric@orange.com>
Organization: France Telecom
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130106 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ccamp@ietf.org
References: <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8257FBA@MISOUT7MSGUSR9O.ITServices.sbc.com>
In-Reply-To: <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C8257FBA@MISOUT7MSGUSR9O.ITServices.sbc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Jan 2013 09:23:20.0702 (UTC) FILETIME=[4786D1E0:01CDFE02]
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Poll on making draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03 WG document
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:23:23 -0000

Hi.

I still have doubts on the actual applicability of cost recording in the 
field, but yes: the latency part deserves support.

Julien


Le 24/01/2013 19:47, BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A a écrit :
> All,
> This is start a two week poll on making 
> draft-ali-ccamp-te-metric-recording-03 a ccamp working group document. 
> Please send email to the list indicating “yes/support” or “no/do not 
> support”. If indicating no, please state your technical reservations 
> with the document.
> The poll ends Thursday, Feb^. 7th.
> Note, as stated by some of the authors, there is IPR “still being 
> documented”.
> Thanks,
> Deborah and Lou
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp