IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-ospf-interas-te-extension-02.txt

"Peng He" <peng.he.2000@gmail.com> Tue, 08 May 2007 12:56 UTC

Return-path: <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlPEk-0003rJ-MN for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 08 May 2007 08:56:14 -0400
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlPEj-0004Go-6v for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 08 May 2007 08:56:14 -0400
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1HlP5d-00011L-HE for ccamp-data@psg.com; Tue, 08 May 2007 12:46:49 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.1.7
Received: from [64.233.162.232] (helo=nz-out-0506.google.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <peng.he.2000@gmail.com>) id 1HlP5a-0000ys-Dy for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 08 May 2007 12:46:47 +0000
Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id o37so2430778nzf for <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>; Tue, 08 May 2007 05:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WPb0K+ZCABVrxDa3Kb5+FiTMO36rOwvECkrHSIa49KlvsboN4Vyhk5BCmgV21zTsAn91DlXrC6NU29wIRb2gTjVHM3SwnS2CkeHmWpoT3t+NW4t4pfWlXepd+mHJFETVMjfhYjH0zv8HZ84KPamfY8uhwYfeB+RvRG+yG63kK/Q=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gFAE1xJLbXsrpmZ/FTRDlMUVMvAL8DPlSQRGNgBTzfCLhDJyb2WqMXrvXR9VH7B7iJGtmPGkkYJgGBMkxXFoTuwv4TKRCZEBLdSXTp859mcWVhki4dAJO6AYh4i0+ZRdwkhOJ86i5Elild0ALxNUlfXX5ulaX0PdFWZO0TG3Kdg=
Received: by 10.114.135.1 with SMTP id i1mr2589061wad.1178628405417; Tue, 08 May 2007 05:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.115.15.3 with HTTP; Tue, 8 May 2007 05:46:45 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <406e32c00705080546vad46f04o1b2a0a43cd30dd84@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 08:46:45 -0400
From: Peng He <peng.he.2000@gmail.com>
To: Dan Li <danli@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-ospf-interas-te-extension-02.txt
Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <013e01c79157$e4bfdd30$a04d460a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <014101c78b38$5256fb10$61fadf0a@your029b8cecfe> <013e01c79157$e4bfdd30$a04d460a@china.huawei.com>
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.5 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 0fa76816851382eb71b0a882ccdc29ac

Yes to this I-D.


Regards,
Peng

On 5/8/07, Dan Li <danli@huawei.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes to this I-D.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Dan
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
> To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 11:00 PM
> Subject: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-ospf-interas-te-extension-02.txt
>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > In Prague we discussed this draft and the general opinion seemed to be that
> > this is a useful extension, but that some clarifications needed to be added
> > to the I-D. This new revision appears to address all of the concerns as
> > below.
> >
> > Therefore given the interest in Prague and the relevance of this I-D to our
> > inter-domain TE charter actions, we are polling the WG for adoption of this
> > I-D as a CCAMP draft.
> >
> > Opinions please.
> >
> > Thanks
> > Adrian and Deborah
> >
> > ====
> > Overlap with L1VPN autodiscovery
> >
> >     A question was raised as to whether there was an overlap
> >     with the L1VPN autodiscovery work used to distribute
> >     membership information (draft-ietf-l1vpn-ospf-auto-discovery)
> >
> >     It appears that the mechanisms and purposes are different.
> >
> >     The authors have added text to clarify that there is no overlap.
> >
> > Language change for "OSPF" becomes "OSPF-TE"
> >
> >     Concern was raised that the I-D talked about "OSPF" but the
> >     function is "OSPF-TE".
> >
> >     The authors have updated the I-D accordingly.
> >
> > Include reference to OSPFv3 as well
> >
> >     A request was made to include OSPFv3.
> >
> >     The authors have added text to explain that the same extensions
> >     apply to OSPF v2 and OSPF v3 TE extensions.
> >
> > Make it *incredibly* clear that TE distribution between ASes is
> > not in scope.
> >
> >     Although the I-D had plenty of this material, the authors have
> >     beefed it up further by including the list of things that they are
> >     not doing from their Prague slides.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email