RE: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-ospf-interas-te-extension-02.txt
Young Lee <ylee@huawei.com> Fri, 11 May 2007 15:00 UTC
Return-path: <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HmWbs-0004yl-Kp for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 11 May 2007 11:00:44 -0400
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HmWbq-0002E6-An for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 11 May 2007 11:00:44 -0400
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1HmWSn-000NAU-PU for ccamp-data@psg.com; Fri, 11 May 2007 14:51:21 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.7
Received: from [206.16.17.211] (helo=usaga01-in.huawei.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <ylee@huawei.com>) id 1HmWSg-000NAC-UP for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 11 May 2007 14:51:16 +0000
Received: from huawei.com (usaga01-in [172.18.4.6]) by usaga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTP id <0JHV00L66T75O4@usaga01-in.huawei.com> for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 11 May 2007 07:49:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Lee736821 ([10.124.12.82]) by usaga01-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.25 (built Mar 3 2004)) with ESMTPA id <0JHV00GY2T72KY@usaga01-in.huawei.com> for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Fri, 11 May 2007 07:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 09:49:50 -0500
From: Young Lee <ylee@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-ospf-interas-te-extension-02.txt
In-reply-to: <007701c793a3$a9ec5aa0$650c6f0a@china.huawei.com>
To: 'Adrian Farrel' <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Message-id: <000901c793db$a10c0970$520c7c0a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Thread-index: AceTpDBxenD9xvidSH28X8bwxSw18QAN0wUw
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d185fa790257f526fedfd5d01ed9c976
Yes to this I-D. Young -----Original Message----- From: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org [mailto:owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org] On Behalf Of Zhang Renhai Sent: Friday, May 11, 2007 3:09 AM To: Adrian Farrel; ccamp@ops.ietf.org Subject: Re: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-ospf-interas-te-extension-02.txt Yes to this I-D. Note that I'm a coauthor of this draft. Thanks, Zhang Renhai > Hi, > > In Prague we discussed this draft and the general opinion seemed to be that > this is a useful extension, but that some clarifications needed to be added > to the I-D. This new revision appears to address all of the concerns as > below. > > Therefore given the interest in Prague and the relevance of this I-D to our > inter-domain TE charter actions, we are polling the WG for adoption of this > I-D as a CCAMP draft. > > Opinions please. > > Thanks > Adrian and Deborah > > ==== > Overlap with L1VPN autodiscovery > > A question was raised as to whether there was an overlap > with the L1VPN autodiscovery work used to distribute > membership information (draft-ietf-l1vpn-ospf-auto-discovery) > > It appears that the mechanisms and purposes are different. > > The authors have added text to clarify that there is no overlap. > > Language change for "OSPF" becomes "OSPF-TE" > > Concern was raised that the I-D talked about "OSPF" but the > function is "OSPF-TE". > > The authors have updated the I-D accordingly. > > Include reference to OSPFv3 as well > > A request was made to include OSPFv3. > > The authors have added text to explain that the same extensions > apply to OSPF v2 and OSPF v3 TE extensions. > > Make it *incredibly* clear that TE distribution between ASes is > not in scope. > > Although the I-D had plenty of this material, the authors have > beefed it up further by including the list of things that they are > not doing from their Prague slides. > > > > >
- Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-ospf-… Adrian Farrel
- Re: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-o… JP Vasseur
- Re: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-o… Dan Li
- Re: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-o… Peng He
- Re: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-o… Greg Bernstein
- RE: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-o… Lucy Yong
- Re: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-o… Zhang Renhai
- RE: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-o… Young Lee
- RE: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-o… Dean Cheng (dcheng)
- Re: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-o… Adrian Farrel
- Re: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-o… Mach Chen