Re: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-ospf-interas-te-extension-02.txt
Mach Chen <mach@huawei.com> Tue, 05 June 2007 01:13 UTC
Return-path: <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HvNbb-0003v4-N7 for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:13:03 -0400
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HvNba-0006pc-Cn for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:13:03 -0400
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1HvNVR-000EPJ-HI for ccamp-data@psg.com; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:06:41 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.8
Received: from [61.144.161.54] (helo=szxga02-in.huawei.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <mach@huawei.com>) id 1HvNVF-000EOm-UU for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 01:06:35 +0000
Received: from huawei.com (szxga02-in [172.24.2.6]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JJ500F6I1QS8Q@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:06:28 +0800 (CST)
Received: from M55527 ([10.111.12.154]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JJ50072Y1QQGD@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:06:28 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:06:29 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-ospf-interas-te-extension-02.txt
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
Cc: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Message-id: <001301c7a70d$bfab0c60$9a0c6f0a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <014101c78b38$5256fb10$61fadf0a@your029b8cecfe> <019101c7a6fd$33776d70$1601fe0a@your029b8cecfe>
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: e1b0e72ff1bbd457ceef31828f216a86
Hi Adrian and all, Yes, we will resubmit this I-D before the cut-offs for Chicago. Best regards, Mach ----- Original Message ----- From: "Adrian Farrel" <default@olddog.co.uk> To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 7:07 AM Subject: Re: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-ospf-interas-te-extension-02.txt > Well, I wouldn't say we were overwhelmed with responses, but all that we saw > were positive (although there is a technical point from Jean-Louis to be > addresses). > > The chairs believe that this I-D is a useful, if small, building block for > inter-AS TE so we will make it a WG draft. > > Authors, please resubmit your I-D as > draft-ietf-ccamp-ospf-interas-te-extension-00.txt. Please make no changes > except: > - file name > - dates > - anything needed to pass through idnits > > Can you get this done before he cut-offs for Chicago? > > Thanks, > Adrian > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> > To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org> > Sent: Monday, April 30, 2007 4:00 PM > Subject: Polling for WG adoption of > draft-chen-ccamp-ospf-interas-te-extension-02.txt > > >> Hi, >> >> In Prague we discussed this draft and the general opinion seemed to be >> that this is a useful extension, but that some clarifications needed to be >> added to the I-D. This new revision appears to address all of the concerns >> as below. >> >> Therefore given the interest in Prague and the relevance of this I-D to >> our inter-domain TE charter actions, we are polling the WG for adoption of >> this I-D as a CCAMP draft. >> >> Opinions please. >> >> Thanks >> Adrian and Deborah >> >> ==== >> Overlap with L1VPN autodiscovery >> >> A question was raised as to whether there was an overlap >> with the L1VPN autodiscovery work used to distribute >> membership information (draft-ietf-l1vpn-ospf-auto-discovery) >> >> It appears that the mechanisms and purposes are different. >> >> The authors have added text to clarify that there is no overlap. >> >> Language change for "OSPF" becomes "OSPF-TE" >> >> Concern was raised that the I-D talked about "OSPF" but the >> function is "OSPF-TE". >> >> The authors have updated the I-D accordingly. >> >> Include reference to OSPFv3 as well >> >> A request was made to include OSPFv3. >> >> The authors have added text to explain that the same extensions >> apply to OSPF v2 and OSPF v3 TE extensions. >> >> Make it *incredibly* clear that TE distribution between ASes is >> not in scope. >> >> Although the I-D had plenty of this material, the authors have >> beefed it up further by including the list of things that they are >> not doing from their Prague slides. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > >
- Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-ospf-… Adrian Farrel
- Re: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-o… JP Vasseur
- Re: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-o… Dan Li
- Re: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-o… Peng He
- Re: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-o… Greg Bernstein
- RE: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-o… Lucy Yong
- Re: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-o… Zhang Renhai
- RE: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-o… Young Lee
- RE: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-o… Dean Cheng (dcheng)
- Re: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-o… Adrian Farrel
- Re: Polling for WG adoption of draft-chen-ccamp-o… Mach Chen