IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-03

"Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com> Fri, 07 February 2014 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <zali@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFE11A1F78 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 07:04:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.035
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.035 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VefimajtRFCq for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 07:04:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718C41A1F5B for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 07:04:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=18887; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1391785497; x=1392995097; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=BNah/TOIG+4FoW0ISV6hzzk0dJFf3EbakrOyUS8K3wY=; b=j/Cjn85B/qv4UO5AF9uouUWSOgM/uM9ultlaQNC83Jn8SGksjSLEEyKv jkDwqOsyLEVV6to9NQqb2aoOxXoyWo8tWKkCDD1YDpILZCQI4W4lrYb/u +tTp40OTWvwApyeTXiSizN8TR5u+mmLfNQV1ZzuglRhIakRMSGrvyNLiJ M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AugGAOr09FKtJXHB/2dsb2JhbABZgkhEOFeDAbMQiFcYdhZ0giUBAQEEIwpBHQEIEQMBAQEoAwIEMBQJCAEBBAESCRKHag2rVaEVF45sFwGCb4FJBJgrgTKQb4Mtgio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.95,801,1384300800"; d="scan'208,217"; a="18737651"
Received: from rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com ([173.37.113.193]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 07 Feb 2014 15:04:57 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com [173.37.183.75]) by rcdn-core2-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s17F4vMI004425 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 7 Feb 2014 15:04:57 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([169.254.4.215]) by xhc-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([173.37.183.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 09:04:56 -0600
From: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali@cisco.com>
To: Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-03
Thread-Index: Ac8jdtO/9HhKhzV1QvabPhbP4TmBNQAV8m1wABQBi4A=
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 15:04:56 +0000
Message-ID: <CF1A5D86.95021%zali@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF85CAB4341@SZXEMA504-MBS.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.3.120616
x-originating-ip: [10.86.254.185]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_CF1A5D8695021zaliciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-03
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 15:04:59 -0000

Hi Fatai, John-

We had a long discussion and agreement that draft-zhang-ccamp-route-exclusion-pathkey-00<http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-ccamp-route-exclusion-pathkey-00> requires a PCE that needs to keep state of ALL LSPs it has served (as long as they exists in the network). There is also a scaling issue as it limits number of LSPs PCE can serve. So calling it is "simple" is NOT a correct statement. You solution requires a path-stateful PCE.

Also to note from last IETF meeting minutes: http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/minutes/minutes-88-ccamp
Lou Berger: "PCE: operating without the PCE is still in the scope of this WG." Our solution is without the use of PCE (signaling based).

Thanks

Regards … Zafar

From: Fatai Zhang <zhangfatai@huawei.com<mailto:zhangfatai@huawei.com>>
Date: Friday, February 7, 2014 1:50 AM
To: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com<mailto:db3546@att.com>>, "ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>" <ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-03

Hi Deborah and all，

I think you might have noticed that there is another draft (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-zhang-ccamp-route-exclusion-pathkey-00), which describe a simple solution to address the same requirement as draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity and there were lots of discussion on the both drafts in the WG list.

In my understanding from the WG discussion, I think many people prefer draft-zhang because it is more straightforward and simple.

The authors of draft-zhang tried to contact the authors of draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity to discuss how to move forward these drafts, but nothing happened.

Therefore, the guidance from the WG chairs on how to move forward the both drafts (e.g, pick up one of them to go or any other suggestions) would be appreciated.




Best Regards

Fatai

From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 4:06 AM
To: ccamp@ietf.org<mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-03

All,

This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-03.

This working group last call ends Feb. 20th. Please send your comments to the CCAMP mailing list.

Deborah and Lou

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email