Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-03

Dieter Beller <> Mon, 10 February 2014 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB3D1A088F for <>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 06:16:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.176
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.176 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SafWJD1IRX43 for <>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 06:16:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A9C1A088B for <>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 06:16:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id s1AEGEUZ025797 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:16:16 -0600 (CST)
Received: from ( []) by (GMO) with ESMTP id s1AEGDV0011302 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:16:14 +0100
Received: from [] ( []) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s1AEGBps026549 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:16:12 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:16:11 +0100
From: Dieter Beller <>
Organization: Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniele Ceccarelli <>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <>, "" <>
References: <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-03
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:16:25 -0000

Hi Daniele, all,

On 09.02.2014 16:16, Daniele Ceccarelli wrote:

Deborah, CCAMP,


I think it is too early to progress this document.


I would suggest to wait for the framework and use cases documents to be more stable and most of all I would like to see a document called LSP diversity cover all the possible diversity scenarios: with PCE vs without PCE, single homing vs dual homing, etc (this is why I was suggesting to have the fwk and use cases “more stable”).


Maybe a merge with" rel="nofollow">draft-fedyk-ccamp-uni-extensions and" rel="nofollow">draft-zhang-ccamp-route-exclusion-pathkey would make the document much more useful.

this sounds like a good approach - let's figure out whether we can find a single solution that is applicable to all the
different lsp diversity use cases. Therefore, I have reservations moving forward with draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-03
independently of the other drafts.





Sent: giovedì 6 febbraio 2014 21:06
Subject: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-03




This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-03.


This working group last call ends Feb. 20th. Please send your comments to the CCAMP mailing list.


Deborah and Lou