Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-03

Dieter Beller <Dieter.Beller@alcatel-lucent.com> Mon, 10 February 2014 14:16 UTC

Return-Path: <Dieter.Beller@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB3D1A088F for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 06:16:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.176
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.176 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SafWJD1IRX43 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 06:16:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hoemail1.alcatel.com (hoemail1.alcatel.com [192.160.6.148]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A9C1A088B for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Feb 2014 06:16:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (h135-239-2-122.lucent.com [135.239.2.122]) by hoemail1.alcatel.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id s1AEGEUZ025797 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 08:16:16 -0600 (CST)
Received: from destgsu0709.de.alcatel-lucent.com (slsv7at.de.alcatel-lucent.com [149.204.245.107]) by fr711usmtp1.zeu.alcatel-lucent.com (GMO) with ESMTP id s1AEGDV0011302 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:16:14 +0100
Received: from [149.204.106.180] (DESTGN0H466262.de.alcatel-lucent.com [149.204.106.180]) (authenticated bits=0) by destgsu0709.de.alcatel-lucent.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s1AEGBps026549 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:16:12 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <52F8DF2B.9050309@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 15:16:11 +0100
From: Dieter Beller <Dieter.Beller@alcatel-lucent.com>
Organization: Alcatel-Lucent
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Daniele Ceccarelli <daniele.ceccarelli@ericsson.com>, "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <db3546@att.com>, "ccamp@ietf.org" <ccamp@ietf.org>
References: <F64C10EAA68C8044B33656FA214632C80C1385F8@MISOUT7MSGUSR9O.ITServices.sbc.com> <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48126898DB@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <4A1562797D64E44993C5CBF38CF1BE48126898DB@ESESSMB301.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-03
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp/>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 14:16:25 -0000

Hi Daniele, all,


On 09.02.2014 16:16, Daniele Ceccarelli wrote:

Deborah, CCAMP,

 

I think it is too early to progress this document.

 

I would suggest to wait for the framework and use cases documents to be more stable and most of all I would like to see a document called LSP diversity cover all the possible diversity scenarios: with PCE vs without PCE, single homing vs dual homing, etc (this is why I was suggesting to have the fwk and use cases “more stable”).

 

Maybe a merge with http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-fedyk-ccamp-uni-extensions-03.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-fedyk-ccamp-uni-extensions and http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-zhang-ccamp-route-exclusion-pathkey-00.txt" rel="nofollow">draft-zhang-ccamp-route-exclusion-pathkey would make the document much more useful.

this sounds like a good approach - let's figure out whether we can find a single solution that is applicable to all the
different lsp diversity use cases. Therefore, I have reservations moving forward with draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-03
independently of the other drafts.


Thanks,
Dieter

 

BR
Daniele

 

From: CCAMP [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A
Sent: giovedì 6 febbraio 2014 21:06
To: ccamp@ietf.org
Subject: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-03

 

All,

 

This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-03.

 

This working group last call ends Feb. 20th. Please send your comments to the CCAMP mailing list.

 

Deborah and Lou