Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-03

Fatai Zhang <> Fri, 07 February 2014 06:50 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 491A01A05B0 for <>; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:50:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.735
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.735 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cyz-iuCjx12P for <>; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:50:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967051A05AE for <>; Thu, 6 Feb 2014 22:50:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from (EHLO ([]) by (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BAW41785; Fri, 07 Feb 2014 06:50:45 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 06:49:58 +0000
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 06:50:41 +0000
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Fri, 7 Feb 2014 14:50:35 +0800
From: Fatai Zhang <>
To: "BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A" <>, "" <>
Thread-Topic: WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-03
Thread-Index: Ac8jdtO/9HhKhzV1QvabPhbP4TmBNQAV8m1w
Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 06:50:34 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F82A4B6D50F9464B8EBA55651F541CF85CAB4341SZXEMA504MBSchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-03
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Feb 2014 06:50:50 -0000

Hi Deborah and all,

I think you might have noticed that there is another draft (, which describe a simple solution to address the same requirement as draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity and there were lots of discussion on the both drafts in the WG list.

In my understanding from the WG discussion, I think many people prefer draft-zhang because it is more straightforward and simple.

The authors of draft-zhang tried to contact the authors of draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity to discuss how to move forward these drafts, but nothing happened.

Therefore, the guidance from the WG chairs on how to move forward the both drafts (e.g, pick up one of them to go or any other suggestions) would be appreciated.

Best Regards


Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 4:06 AM
Subject: [CCAMP] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-03


This starts a two-week working group last call on draft-ietf-ccamp-lsp-diversity-03.

This working group last call ends Feb. 20th. Please send your comments to the CCAMP mailing list.

Deborah and Lou