Re: Asking again about draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements

"tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com> Mon, 15 October 2007 17:30 UTC

Return-path: <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhTm9-0000Bo-2X for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:30:45 -0400
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IhTm5-0002q1-RT for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 13:30:43 -0400
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1IhTYt-000OaH-3m for ccamp-data@psg.com; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:17:03 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.1
Received: from [62.241.163.7] (helo=blaster.systems.pipex.net) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <cfinss@dial.pipex.com>) id 1IhTYq-000OZ2-Fw for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:17:01 +0000
Received: from pc6 (1Cust36.tnt6.lnd4.gbr.da.uu.net [62.188.135.36]) by blaster.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 4D0DFE0002D2; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 18:16:46 +0100 (BST)
Message-ID: <04e201c80f45$d1eba2e0$0601a8c0@pc6>
Reply-To: "tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com>
From: "tom.petch" <cfinss@dial.pipex.com>
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
References: <0e8601c80d9b$59115820$5102010a@your029b8cecfe>
Subject: Re: Asking again about draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements
Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 11:58:46 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: -102.1 (---------------------------------------------------)
X-Scan-Signature: bb8f917bb6b8da28fc948aeffb74aa17

Yes, adopt.

Tom Petch

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 3:16 PM
Subject: Asking again about draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements


> Hi,
> 
> When we asked about adopting 
> draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-01.txt as a WG document we didn't 
> get thorough consensus, and since both Deborah and I are authors on the 
> draft, we decided we should play it very safe.
> 
> The new revision, draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt, attempts 
> to reach closure on the issues raised when we polled the list, and some of 
> our own concerns.
> 
> So, second time of asking...
> 
> Do you think draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt should be 
> adopted as a CCAMP working group draft?
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> 
> 
> 
> 
>