IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Asking again about draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Mon, 22 October 2007 09:08 UTC

Return-path: <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IjtGz-00020T-5r for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 05:08:33 -0400
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IjtGy-000200-S2 for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 05:08:33 -0400
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1Ijt7O-000Lm0-Dw for ccamp-data@psg.com; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:58:38 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.1
Received: from [212.23.3.140] (helo=pythagoras.zen.co.uk) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <adrian@olddog.co.uk>) id 1Ijt7M-000Lli-0c for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:58:37 +0000
Received: from [88.96.235.138] (helo=cortex.aria-networks.com) by pythagoras.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ijt7K-00012f-Qo for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Mon, 22 Oct 2007 08:58:34 +0000
Received: from your029b8cecfe ([81.140.15.32] RDNS failed) by cortex.aria-networks.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:58:34 +0100
Message-ID: <011001c81489$b76788f0$0200a8c0@your029b8cecfe>
Reply-To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
References: <0e8601c80d9b$59115820$5102010a@your029b8cecfe>
Subject: Re: Asking again about draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2007 09:58:24 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="response"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Oct 2007 08:58:34.0462 (UTC) FILETIME=[BA0E17E0:01C81489]
X-Originating-Pythagoras-IP: [88.96.235.138]
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7baded97d9887f7a0c7e8a33c2e3ea1b

Looks like a good positive response with no dissention.

We will adopt.

Thanks,
Adrian
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 2:16 PM
Subject: Asking again about draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements


> Hi,
>
> When we asked about adopting 
> draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-01.txt as a WG document we 
> didn't get thorough consensus, and since both Deborah and I are authors on 
> the draft, we decided we should play it very safe.
>
> The new revision, draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt, 
> attempts to reach closure on the issues raised when we polled the list, 
> and some of our own concerns.
>
> So, second time of asking...
>
> Do you think draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt should be 
> adopted as a CCAMP working group draft?
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
>
>
>
>
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email