IETF Logo Mail Archive

Asking again about draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sat, 13 October 2007 13:26 UTC

Return-path: <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Igh0I-0000Pc-8a for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 09:26:06 -0400
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Igh0H-0003XC-2J for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 09:26:06 -0400
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1Iggrp-0005WF-Fg for ccamp-data@psg.com; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:17:21 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE, STOX_REPLY_TYPE autolearn=no version=3.2.1
Received: from [212.23.3.140] (helo=pythagoras.zen.co.uk) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <adrian@olddog.co.uk>) id 1Iggre-0005VI-Qu for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:17:16 +0000
Received: from [88.96.235.138] (helo=cortex.aria-networks.com) by pythagoras.zen.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Iggrb-0007oN-DC for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Sat, 13 Oct 2007 13:17:07 +0000
Received: from your029b8cecfe ([81.140.15.32] RDNS failed) by cortex.aria-networks.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:17:06 +0100
Message-ID: <0e8601c80d9b$59115820$5102010a@your029b8cecfe>
Reply-To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Subject: Asking again about draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 14:16:59 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Oct 2007 13:17:06.0641 (UTC) FILETIME=[5A510410:01C80D9B]
X-Originating-Pythagoras-IP: [88.96.235.138]
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: 7655788c23eb79e336f5f8ba8bce7906

Hi,

When we asked about adopting 
draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-01.txt as a WG document we didn't 
get thorough consensus, and since both Deborah and I are authors on the 
draft, we decided we should play it very safe.

The new revision, draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt, attempts 
to reach closure on the issues raised when we polled the list, and some of 
our own concerns.

So, second time of asking...

Do you think draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt should be 
adopted as a CCAMP working group draft?

Thanks,
Adrian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email