IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Asking again about draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements

Dan Li <danli@huawei.com> Tue, 16 October 2007 01:15 UTC

Return-path: <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ihb1o-0006Zz-Ti for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:15:24 -0400
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ihb1j-0003y2-J6 for ccamp-archive@ietf.org; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:15:24 -0400
Received: from majordom by psg.com with local (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org>) id 1IhasN-0000lf-Us for ccamp-data@psg.com; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:05:39 +0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on psg.com
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.2.1
Received: from [61.144.161.54] (helo=szxga02-in.huawei.com) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <danli@huawei.com>) id 1IhasI-0000l0-AS for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 01:05:38 +0000
Received: from huawei.com (szxga02-in [172.24.2.6]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JPZ0078CCD8OT@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:05:33 +0800 (CST)
Received: from huawei.com ([172.24.1.24]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0JPZ00NJ8CD81M@szxga02-in.huawei.com> for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:05:32 +0800 (CST)
Received: from l37133 ([10.70.77.75]) by szxml04-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JPZ004UGCD8IF@szxml04-in.huawei.com> for ccamp@ops.ietf.org; Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:05:32 +0800 (CST)
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 09:05:12 +0800
From: Dan Li <danli@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: Asking again about draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements
To: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Message-id: <011901c80f90$9a9eba20$4b4d460a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
Content-type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
References: <0e8601c80d9b$59115820$5102010a@your029b8cecfe>
Sender: owner-ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Precedence: bulk
X-Spam-Score: -4.0 (----)
X-Scan-Signature: 39bd8f8cbb76cae18b7e23f7cf6b2b9f

Yes, it should be adopted as a CCAMP WG draft.

Regards,

Dan

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: <ccamp@ops.ietf.org>
Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2007 9:16 PM
Subject: Asking again about draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements


> Hi,
> 
> When we asked about adopting 
> draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-01.txt as a WG document we didn't 
> get thorough consensus, and since both Deborah and I are authors on the 
> draft, we decided we should play it very safe.
> 
> The new revision, draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt, attempts 
> to reach closure on the issues raised when we polled the list, and some of 
> our own concerns.
> 
> So, second time of asking...
> 
> Do you think draft-nadeau-ccamp-gmpls-oam-requirements-02.txt should be 
> adopted as a CCAMP working group draft?
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email