[CCAMP] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-yang-25.txt> (A YANG Data Model for WSON (Wavelength Switched Optical Networks)) to Proposed Standard

[tom petch <[e-mail]>]

One final thought on this I-D.  As most of you will have seen,
I have queried the placement of the network type wson-topology
under te-topology instead of under network-types not seeing
an explanation of the rationale of the tree structure in the RFC that 
set up the namespace for this scenario.  I struggle to see the benefit 
of one over the other when it comes to using the YANG modules in a 
network, creating the data and accessing it, and have a vague concern 
that this hierarchy may turn out to be limiting in future.
However, noone else agrees with me so I will leave it at that; I post
this here for completeness, the discussion having spanned three WG.
I note that the other CCAMP modules use the same placement.

Tom Petch

>>> Abstract
>>>
>>>
>>>     This document provides a YANG data model for the routing and
>>>     wavelength assignment (RWA) TE topology in wavelength switched
>>>     optical networks (WSONs).  The YANG data model defined in this
>>>     document conforms to the Network Management Datastore Architecture
>>>     (NMDA).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The file can be obtained via
>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ccamp-wson-yang/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.
>>>
>>>
>>> The document contains these normative downward references.
>>> See RFC 3967 for additional information:
>>>      draft-ietf-ccamp-optical-impairment-topology-yang: A Yang Data
>>> Model for Optical Impairment-aware Topology (None - IETF stream)
>>>      draft-ietf-ccamp-flexigrid-yang: YANG data model for Flexi-Grid
>>> Optical Networks (None - IETF stream)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> IETF-Announce mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf-announce
>>> .
>>>
>>
>