Re: Moving forward with the CCAMP charter

[JP Vasseur <[e-mail]>]

Hi Adrian,

Looks like a detailed, ambitious constructive action plan.

Two comments:

(1) Analysis of inter-domain issues for disjoint and protected paths
       - Informational I-D to close off the topic and devolve to PCE
       * first version of WG draft
       * submit for IESG review

Could you briefly elaborate on this item ?

(2) May be in the same bucket as draft-ali-ccamp-mpls-graceful- 
shutdown, you may want to add draft-leroux-ccamp-ctrl- 
saturation-01.txt ?

thanks.

JP.

On Aug 16, 2005, at 7:28 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Please find attached a file that contains:
>
> - a set of proposed *draft* milestones
> - a discussion of why there are so many milestones
> - a high-level explanation of the work items.
>
> Note that this looks like a lot of milestones, but please read the  
> text on this issue in the attached file. The bottom line is that  
> this is a product of micro management where I have tried to  
> identify all of the I-Ds that we might produce to cover the  
> referenced work, and where I have placed two (sometimes three)  
> milestones for each I-D.
>
> This micro-management may be over the top, and represents a full  
> pendulum swing from the previous style of CCAMP milestones, but in  
> the light of the hiatus of the last 12 months, i think this may be  
> beneficial and might achieve rapid forwards movement.
>
> I would welcome your (constructive!) comments.
>
> Notes:
> - Why isn't my I-D also cited as input material?
>   No insult intended. The current list is simply there to
>   show the ADs that work is already in progress. All I-Ds
>   will be used as input.
> - Why isn't my pet topic included?
>   Are you sure it is not there between the lines? This
>   list of milestones isn't completely proscriptive.
>
> The objective is to have the WG agreed on the milestones that it  
> wants to commit to by the end of August.
>
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> <ccamp-milestones.txt>