Re: Moving forward with the CCAMP charter

[JP Vasseur <[e-mail]>]

Hi Adrian,

On Aug 16, 2005, at 2:53 PM, Adrian Farrel wrote:

>> (1) Analysis of inter-domain issues for disjoint and protected paths
>>        - Informational I-D to close off the topic and devolve to PCE
>>        * first version of WG draft
>>        * submit for IESG review
>>
>> Could you briefly elaborate on this item ?
>>
>
> I think we have the need for an informational I-D that is a bit  
> like the
> existing inter-domain framework I-D, but that examines the more  
> complex
> question of the provisioning of disjoint and protection paths across
> domain boundaries. I am aware that there a lot of ideas out there  
> and that
> there has been a lot of research. I think we need to capture an  
> overview.
>

ok fair enough ... I'll be happy to provide my input on the topic (as  
you can imagine ;-))

> It is my (personal - not WG chair) opinion that this I-D will point  
> firmly
> at the PCE WG. But just as for single paths we discovered that  
> there are
> some (limited) scenarios for single paths where signaling is  
> suitable on
> its own, we may find some solutions for diverse and protected paths.
>
>
>> (2) May be in the same bucket as draft-ali-ccamp-mpls-graceful-
>> shutdown, you may want to add draft-leroux-ccamp-ctrl-
>> saturation-01.txt ?
>>
>
> Yes. I am inclined to add a work item for "control plane robustness".
>

Thanks.

JP.

> Adrian
>