Re: [CCAMP] Recommendation G.798 (2010) Amendment 2 (04/12)

Agreed. Another option is to just wait for it to be published if the
document is likely to be published in the near future...

Lou

On 1/10/2013 8:05 AM, Adrian Farrel wrote:
> You're right.
> 
> Although this seems to have been approved in April 2012 and is "in force", it is
> in "pre-published state" and can only be downloaded by people with an ITU-T
> access account (TIES).
> 
> If you need the material for review you have two options:
> 1. Send a liaison statement asking that you are sent a copy
> 2. Ask the liaison manager (John Drake) to negotiate direct with the
>     relevant ITU-T folk to get hold of a copy.
> There shouldn't be an issue in either case because the document is in the
> publication process.
> 
> If you are only worried about the normative reference, then don't worry. The I-D
> can be held in the RFC Editor Queue until the Amendment is finally published
> (although you might want to call this out in the shepherd write-up so that it is
> not fumbled).
> 
> Cheers,
> Adrian
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> Lou Berger
>> Sent: 09 January 2013 17:16
>> To: CCAMP
>> Subject: [CCAMP] Recommendation G.798 (2010) Amendment 2 (04/12)
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Does anyone know when this document is going to be publicly available?
>> Unless I missed it, I don't think IETF participants have open access to
>> this document and it is being referenced in the g.709 drafts.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Lou
>> _______________________________________________
>> CCAMP mailing list
>> CCAMP@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 