Re: [CCAMP] Recommendation G.798 (2010) Amendment 2 (04/12)

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Thu, 10 January 2013 13:05 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 538FF21F8833 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 05:05:21 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.55
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.55 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.049, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Eds-DUcUx2nx for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 05:05:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7ADB821F882E for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 05:05:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0AD5HMd026646; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:05:18 GMT
Received: from 950129200 (089144192226.atnat0001.highway.a1.net [89.144.192.226]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r0AD5EC6026592 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:05:16 GMT
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Lou Berger' <lberger@labn.net>, 'CCAMP' <ccamp@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:05:16 -0000
Message-ID: <001401cdef33$243758f0$6ca60ad0$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac3vMyFObSEnmBJVSSmdb+wyYQL5ZA==
Content-Language: en-gb
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Recommendation G.798 (2010) Amendment 2 (04/12)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:05:21 -0000

You're right.

Although this seems to have been approved in April 2012 and is "in force", it is
in "pre-published state" and can only be downloaded by people with an ITU-T
access account (TIES).

If you need the material for review you have two options:
1. Send a liaison statement asking that you are sent a copy
2. Ask the liaison manager (John Drake) to negotiate direct with the
    relevant ITU-T folk to get hold of a copy.
There shouldn't be an issue in either case because the document is in the
publication process.

If you are only worried about the normative reference, then don't worry. The I-D
can be held in the RFC Editor Queue until the Amendment is finally published
(although you might want to call this out in the shepherd write-up so that it is
not fumbled).

Cheers,
Adrian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Lou Berger
> Sent: 09 January 2013 17:16
> To: CCAMP
> Subject: [CCAMP] Recommendation G.798 (2010) Amendment 2 (04/12)
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Does anyone know when this document is going to be publicly available?
> Unless I missed it, I don't think IETF participants have open access to
> this document and it is being referenced in the g.709 drafts.
> 
> Thanks,
> Lou
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp