IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [CCAMP] Recommendation G.798 (2010) Amendment 2 (04/12)

Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net> Fri, 11 January 2013 20:01 UTC

Return-Path: <lberger@labn.net>
X-Original-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1582121F8B2E for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:01:40 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.368
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.368 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.231, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9o-xNbF1kD68 for <ccamp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:01:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oproxy11-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy11-pub.bluehost.com [173.254.64.10]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id C10A821F8B0E for <ccamp@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:01:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 10842 invoked by uid 0); 11 Jan 2013 20:01:14 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box313.bluehost.com) (69.89.31.113) by oproxy11.bluehost.com with SMTP; 11 Jan 2013 20:01:14 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=labn.net; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:CC:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=pqzQddy+1GNPWHKVJInE/0S+cq0sUxzLzmcXeQP9/VE=; b=DxBrJy91k5VpWcDMkCXrNeFvR77TxgmFlMzEoRGANq1Vy5xoi0VoIsM00kSZ0kz+jFggVj3cLlXIAawV8TE0iU455Nr4hsrBvq+wlywD9zyiLAPocN15FT6oTtXtOswp;
Received: from box313.bluehost.com ([69.89.31.113]:40133 helo=[127.0.0.1]) by box313.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <lberger@labn.net>) id 1Ttkmw-0006yq-Bt; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 13:01:14 -0700
Message-ID: <50F06F91.7040507@labn.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:01:21 -0500
From: Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Shew, Stephen" <sshew@ciena.com>
References: <50EDA5E3.80106@labn.net> <510C3D5C5DFBCB46AE189D936C1DD605A6F4853EBF@ONWVEXCHMB02.ciena.com>
In-Reply-To: <510C3D5C5DFBCB46AE189D936C1DD605A6F4853EBF@ONWVEXCHMB02.ciena.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Identified-User: {1038:box313.bluehost.com:labnmobi:labn.net} {sentby:smtp auth 69.89.31.113 authed with lberger@labn.net}
Cc: CCAMP <ccamp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CCAMP] Recommendation G.798 (2010) Amendment 2 (04/12)
X-BeenThere: ccamp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion list for the CCAMP working group <ccamp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ccamp>
List-Post: <mailto:ccamp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp>, <mailto:ccamp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 20:01:40 -0000

Stephen,
	That's great.  Thank you.

Authors,
	Keep in mind, when referencing new specifications from other bodies,
once the referenced spec is approved we can always request that pre
publication versions be sent via a liaison.  Clearly we don't need one
in this case given publication timing.

Lou

On 1/11/2013 1:19 PM, Shew, Stephen wrote:
> I contacted the ITU-T editing staff (similar to the RFC editor) and
> they indicated that unless there are any editorial issues which
> require resolution by the G.709 editor, the amendment should be
> published by the end of this month (January).  So, it shouldn't be
> long.
> 
> Stephen
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ccamp-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ccamp-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lou Berger
> Sent: 09 January, 2013 12:16
> To: CCAMP
> Subject: [CCAMP] Recommendation G.798 (2010) Amendment 2 (04/12)
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Does anyone know when this document is going to be publicly available?
> Unless I missed it, I don't think IETF participants have open access to this document and it is being referenced in the g.709 drafts.
> 
> Thanks,
> Lou
> _______________________________________________
> CCAMP mailing list
> CCAMP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ccamp
> 
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email