RE: Suppression of Downstream Alarms...
Jonathan Lang <jplang@calient.net> Wed, 21 November 2001 00:23 UTC
Envelope-to: ccamp-data@psg.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 16:33:06 -0800
Message-ID: <C12BBE1C7A8F7344808CD8C2A345DFB8455B10@pulsar.chromisys.com>
From: Jonathan Lang <jplang@calient.net>
To: 'Carmine Daloia' <daloia@lucent.com>, ccamp@ops.ietf.org
Cc: tsg15q11@itu.int, t1x15@t1.org
Subject: RE: Suppression of Downstream Alarms...
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 16:23:58 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Carmine, Please see inline. Thanks, Jonathan > -----Original Message----- > From: Carmine Daloia [mailto:daloia@lucent.com] > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 6:44 AM > To: ccamp@ops.ietf.org > Cc: tsg15q11@itu.int; t1x15@t1.org > Subject: LMP: Suppression of Downstream Alarms... > > > Hi all, > > As I read through Section 6 "Fault Management", one issue that it seems > to be addressing is "Suppression of Downstream Alarms". > > In section 6.2, it states that "If data links fail between two PXCs, the > power monitoring system in all of the downstream nodes may detect LOL > and indicate a failure. To avoid multiple alarms stemming from the same > failure, LMP provides a failure notification through the ChannelStatus > message...". > > I agree that the suppression of downstream alarms is an important issue. great! > > If we look at standard networks (both SONET/SDH and OTN), this > capability is already provided by the overhead in SDH/SONET and G.709 > OTN. G.709 OTN handles suppression of alarms in both all-optical > networks as well as opaque networks. I don't think we need to burden the > control plane with such functions when the transport plane handles this > in standard networks. In fact the transport plane handles suppression of > alarms on all equipment in the network (not just cross-connects). > > If we look at a pre-OTN ("non-standard") scenario consisting of > Cross-connects, Optical Line Systems, and Optical Amplifiers supporting > a DWDM networked solution, we can analyze two scenarios. One scenario is > an opaque network (e.g., the OLS supports 3R). In this scenario, the > downstream Cross-connects would not detect LOL upon faults occurring > upstream. The 3R points on the OLS Line Systems would insert some type > of signal downstream. Therefore the mechanism described in Section 6.2 > does not apply. Another scenario is an all-optical pre-OTN network. Note > that other equipment besides Cross-connects (e.g., Optical Amplifiers) > in an all-optical network may alarm due to upstream faults. These alarms > also need to be suppressed. LMP seems to only address the suppression of > downstream alarms on cross-connects without taking into consideration > the network that sits between the cross-connects. Is LMP also expected > to have to be processed on Optical Amplifiers? This seems to be > undesirable, especially given all the various applications that seem to > be included into the LMP protocol that would not have anything to do > with Optical Amplifieris. For interaction between cross-connects and Line Systems, please see OLI Requirements document (http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-many-oli-reqts-00.txt) and corresponding LMP-WDM protocol document (new version to be uploaded tomorrow, but old version can be found at http://search.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-fredette-lmp-wdm-02.txt). > > Any other views? > > Carmine >
- Re: FW: [T1X1.5] Re: Suppression of Downstream Al… Carmine Daloia
- FW: [T1X1.5] Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms… Jonathan Lang
- Re: [T1X1.5] Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms… Carmine Daloia
- Re: [T1X1.5] Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms… Carmine Daloia
- RE: [T1X1.5] Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms… Jonathan Lang
- RE: [T1X1.5] Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms… Jonathan Lang
- Re: [T1X1.5] Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms… Sudheer Dharanikota
- Re: [T1X1.5] Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms… Carmine Daloia
- Re: [T1X1.5] Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms… Sudheer Dharanikota
- RE: [T1X1.5] Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms… Jonathan Lang
- Re: [T1X1.5] Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms… Carmine Daloia
- RE: [T1X1.5] Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms… George Young
- Re: [T1X1.5] Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms… Dimitri Papadimitriou
- Re: [T1X1.5] Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms… Maarten Vissers
- Re: [T1X1.5] Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms… Sudheer Dharanikota
- Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms... Sudheer Dharanikota
- Re: [T1X1.5] Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms… Sudheer Dharanikota
- Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms... Dimitri Papadimitriou
- Re: [T1X1.5] Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms… Carmine Daloia
- Re: [T1X1.5] Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms… Carmine Daloia
- Re: [T1X1.5] Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms… Sudheer Dharanikota
- Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms... Carmine Daloia
- Re: [T1X1.5] Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms… Sudheer Dharanikota
- Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms... Sudheer Dharanikota
- Re: [T1X1.5] Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms… Carmine Daloia
- Re: [T1X1.5] Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms… Carmine Daloia
- Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms... Carmine Daloia
- Re: Suppression of Downstream Alarms... Germano Gasparini
- RE: Suppression of Downstream Alarms... neil.2.harrison
- RE: Suppression of Downstream Alarms... Jonathan Lang
- RE: Suppression of Downstream Alarms... Malcolm Betts